private static final byte[] ARRAY234 = {(byte) 2, (byte) 3, (byte) 4};

  private static final byte[] VALUES = {Byte.MIN_VALUE, -1, 0, 1, Byte.MAX_VALUE};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (byte value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Bytes.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Byte.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

                finalizerRan.countDown();
              }
            });

    await(finalizerRan);
    awaitClear(ref);

    // Hope to catch some stragglers queued up behind our finalizable object
    System.runFinalization();
  }

  private static RuntimeException formatRuntimeException(String format, Object... args) {
    return new RuntimeException(String.format(Locale.ROOT, format, args));

  public void testConsecutiveParentsAfterPresent() {
    assertEquals("../..", simplifyPath("./../../"));
    assertEquals("../..", simplifyPath("./.././../"));
  }

  /*
   * We co-opt some URI resolution tests for our purposes.
   * Some of the tests have queries and anchors that are a little silly here.
   */

  /** http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rfc/rfc2396.html#rfc.section.C.1 */
  public void testRfc2396Normal() {

            // While we could look up the domain controller/KDC we cannot really make the java kerberos implementation
            // use a KDC of our choice.
            // A potential workaround would be to try to get the server FQDN by reverse lookup, but this might have
            // security implications and also is not how Microsoft does it.

                finalizerRan.countDown();
              }
            });

    await(finalizerRan);
    awaitClear(ref);

    // Hope to catch some stragglers queued up behind our finalizable object
    System.runFinalization();
  }

  private static RuntimeException formatRuntimeException(String format, Object... args) {
    return new RuntimeException(String.format(Locale.ROOT, format, args));

                 * the map to change between that call and this one. But if that happens, the
                 * behavior is undefined because of the concurrent mutation.)
                 *
                 * (Our prototype checker happens to be "smart" enough to understand this for the
                 * *get* call in getValue but not for the *put* call here.)
                 *

        // Override connectHost to avoid actual network connection on retry
        doAnswer(invocation -> {
            SmbTreeHandleImpl handle = mock(SmbTreeHandleImpl.class);
            // Re-set the same tree to continue using our mock
            setTree(c, tree);
            return handle;
        }).when(c).connectHost(any(), anyString());

        // Execute send - should retry after transport error
        try {

					rpc.UpdateMetacacheListing(ctx, *c)
				}
			}
		}()
		o.ID = ""
	}

	if contextCanceled(ctx) {
		return entries, ctx.Err()
	}
	// Do listing in-place.
	// Create output for our results.
	// Create filter for results.
	o.debugln("Raw List", o)
	filterCh := make(chan metaCacheEntry, o.Limit)
	listCtx, cancelList := context.WithCancel(ctx)
	filteredResults := o.gatherResults(listCtx, filterCh)

In the same server (or servers), there could be **multiple applications**, for example, other API programs or a database.

Only one process can be handling the specific IP and port (the TLS Termination Proxy in our example) but the other applications/processes can be running on the server(s) too, as long as they don't try to use the same **combination of public IP and port**.

<img src="/img/deployment/https/https08.drawio.svg">

  //    There is currently nothing that enforces that the write to inputFuture in the constructor is
  //    visible to done(). This is because there is no happens before edge between the write and a
  //    (hypothetical) unsafe read by our caller. Note: adding 'volatile' does not fix this issue,
  //    it would just add an edge such that if done() observed non-null, then it would also