} catch (NullPointerException e) {
            // Expected behavior when null chain is processed
            assertTrue(true);
        }
    }

    // Test chains order preservation
    @Test
    public void test_chains_orderPreservation() {
        List<TestAuthenticationChain> chains = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {

                  public List<String> order(List<String> insertionOrder) {
                    List<String> order = new ArrayList<>();
                    for (String s : insertionOrder) {
                      int index = order.indexOf(s);
                      if (index == -1) {
                        order.add(s);
                      } else {
                        order.add(index, s);
                      }

 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@Consumer
public interface VersionRangeResolver extends Service {

    /**
     * Expands a version range to a list of matching versions, in ascending order.
     * For example, resolves "[3.8,4.0)" to "3.8", "3.8.1", "3.8.2".
     * The returned list of versions is only dependent on the configured repositories and their contents.

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A utility for testing an Iterator implementation by comparing its behavior to that of a "known
 * good" reference implementation. In order to accomplish this, it's important to test a great
 * variety of sequences of the {@link Iterator#next}, {@link Iterator#hasNext} and {@link
 * Iterator#remove} operations. This utility takes the brute-force approach of trying <i>all</i>

    return new NotPredicate<>(predicate);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a predicate that evaluates to {@code true} if each of its components evaluates to
   * {@code true}. The components are evaluated in order, and evaluation will be "short-circuited"
   * as soon as a false predicate is found. It defensively copies the iterable passed in, so future

      },
      "queryId": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "userSessionId": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "url": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "order": {
        "type": "integer"
      },
      "requestedAt": {
        "type": "date",
        "format": "date_optional_time"
      },
      "queryRequestedAt": {
        "type": "date",

        // because the participant is free to change the dependencies of a project which can potentially change the
        // topological order of the projects, and therefore can potentially change the build order.
        //
        // Note that participants may affect the topological order of the projects, but it is
        // not expected that a participant will add or remove projects from the session.

    // re-order
    getAll(cache, asList(0, 1, 2));
    CacheTesting.drainRecencyQueues(cache);
    assertThat(keySet).containsExactly(3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2);

    // evict 3, 4, 5
    getAll(cache, asList(10, 11, 12));
    CacheTesting.drainRecencyQueues(cache);
    assertThat(keySet).containsExactly(6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12);

    // re-order
    getAll(cache, asList(6, 7, 8));

public class LicenseAnalyzer {
    /*
     * Order here matters. License files can often contain multiple licenses for which the particular piece of software may by used under.
     * We should order these in order of most permissive to least permissive such that we identify the license as the most permissive for
     * purposes of redistribution. Search order is as defined below so the license will be identified as the first pattern to match.

                return delegate.createArray(length);
              }

              @Override
              public Iterable<E> order(List<E> insertionOrder) {
                List<E> list = new ArrayList<>();
                for (E e : delegate.order(insertionOrder)) {
                  list.add(e);
                }
                Collections.reverse(list);
                return list;
              }