]]></description>
  <defaults>
    <default>
      <key>package</key>
      <value>org.apache.maven.profiles</value>
    </default>
  </defaults>
  <classes>
    <class rootElement="true" xml.tagName="profilesXml">
      <name>ProfilesRoot</name>
      <version>1.0.0</version>
      <description>Root element of the profiles.xml file.</description>
      <fields>

   * someone still manages to pass null, let's continue to have the method work.
   *
   * (PatternFilenameFilter is of course one of those classes that shouldn't be a publicly visible
   * class to begin with but rather something returned from a static factory method whose declared
   * return type is plain FilenameFilter. If we made such a change, then the annotation we choose

 *
 * Configures the Project as a test fixtures producer if `src/testFixtures` is a directory:
 * - adds a new `testFixtures` source set which should contain utilities/fixtures to assist in unit testing
 *   classes from the main source set,
 * - the test fixtures are automatically made available to the test classpath.
 *
 * Configures the Project as a test fixtures consumer according to the `testFixtures` extension configuration.
 */

    /**
     * The target class.
     */
    private final Class<?> targetClass;

    /**
     * The name of the method.
     */
    private final String methodName;

    /**
     * The classes of the method arguments.
     */
    private final Class<?>[] methodArgClasses;

    /**
     * Creates a {@link MethodNotFoundRuntimeException}.
     *
     * @param targetClass
     *            Target class

        }
        return name;
    }

    /**
     * Executes a search operation with the specified parameters.
     * This method must be implemented by concrete searcher classes.
     *
     * @param query the search query string
     * @param params the search request parameters including pagination, filters, etc.
     * @param userBean the optional user bean for access control and personalization

        assertEquals(1, slf4jConfiguration.setRootLoggerLevelCallCount);
        assertEquals(Slf4jConfiguration.Level.ERROR, slf4jConfiguration.lastSetLevel);
    }

    // Mock classes for testing
    private static class MockInvokerRequest {
        private final boolean verbose;

        MockInvokerRequest(boolean verbose) {
            this.verbose = verbose;
        }

    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us

    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us

 *
 * @author David Richter
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class IteratorBenchmark {
  @Param({"0", "1", "16", "256", "4096", "65536"})
  int size;

  // use concrete classes to remove any possible polymorphic overhead?
  Object[] array;
  ArrayList<Object> arrayList;
  LinkedList<Object> linkedList;

  @BeforeExperiment
  void setUp() {
    array = new Object[size];

                        handler.getClassifier(),
                        handler.isIncludesDependencies(),
                        handler.isAddedToClasspath()
                                ? new JavaPathType[] {JavaPathType.CLASSES, JavaPathType.MODULES}
                                : new JavaPathType[] {});
            }
            return type;
        });
    }