On the other side, there are thousands of users in the chat systems, so there's a high chance you'll find someone to talk to there, almost all the time. 😄

## Sponsor the author { #sponsor-the-author }

     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map
     * feature for entrySet() that supports add(), or something else
     */

1. APIs marked with the `@Beta` annotation at the class or method level
are subject to change. They can be modified in any way, or even
removed, at any time. If your code is a library itself (i.e. it is
used on the CLASSPATH of users outside your own control), you should
not use beta APIs, unless you [repackage] them. **If your
code is a library, we strongly recommend using the [Guava Beta Checker] to
ensure that you do not use any `@Beta` APIs!**

    Property<String> getSomeProperty()
}
class Example {
    Property<NestedType> getNestedProperty()
}
```

This is unnecessary because users will have trouble creating instances of `NestedType` and merging different instances of `NestedType`. It's also more awkward for users to access the properties in the nested property.

If the nested type is a managed type (Gradle can generate its implementation), you can define a nested property with:

После аутентификации вы увидите следующее:

<img src="/img/tutorial/security/image05.png">

### Получение собственных пользовательских данных { #get-your-own-user-data }

Теперь используйте операцию `GET` с путём `/users/me`.

Вы получите свои пользовательские данные, например:

```JSON
{
  "username": "johndoe",
  "email": "******@****.***",
  "full_name": "John Doe",
  "disabled": false,

   *
   * @param values a series of values
   * @since 33.4.0 (but since 28.2 in the JRE flavor)
   */
  @IgnoreJRERequirement // Users will use this only if they're already using streams.
  public void addAll(DoubleStream values) {
    addAll(values.collect(StatsAccumulator::new, StatsAccumulator::add, StatsAccumulator::addAll));
  }

  /**

	q := r.Form
	opts.Buckets = q.Get("buckets") == "true"
	opts.Policies = q.Get("policies") == "true"
	opts.Groups = q.Get("groups") == "true"
	opts.Users = q.Get("users") == "true"
	opts.ILMExpiryRules = q.Get("ilm-expiry-rules") == "true"
	opts.PeerState = q.Get("peer-state") == "true"
	opts.Entity = madmin.GetSREntityType(q.Get("entity"))
	opts.EntityValue = q.Get("entityvalue")

AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity implementation supports specifying IAM policies in two ways:

1. Role Policy (Recommended): When specified as part of the OpenID provider configuration, all users authenticating via this provider are authorized to (only) use the specified role policy. The policy to associate with such users is specified via the `role_policy` configuration parameter or the `MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_ROLE_POLICY` environment variable. The value is a comma-separated list of IAM access policy names...

   * already been re-added.
   */
  // Technically should accept RemovalNotification<? extends K, ? extends V>, but because
  // RemovalNotification is guaranteed covariant, let's make users' lives simpler.
  void onRemoval(RemovalNotification<K, V> notification);

	ErrAccessTokenExpired = errors.New("access_token expired or unauthorized")
)

// Provider implements identity provider specific admin operations, such as
// looking up users, fetching additional attributes etc.
type Provider interface {
	LoginWithUser(username, password string) error
	LoginWithClientID(clientID, clientSecret string) error
	LookupUser(userid string) (User, error)