* Porque las estructuras de datos de Pydantic son solo <abbr title='En español: ejemplares. Aunque a veces los llaman incorrectamente "instancias"'>instances</abbr> de clases que tu defines, el auto-completado, el linting, mypy y tu intuición deberían funcionar bien con tus datos validados.
* Valida **estructuras complejas**:

import com.google.common.base.MoreObjects;
import com.google.common.base.Objects;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * Statistics about the performance of a {@link Cache}. Instances of this class are immutable.
 *
 * <p>Cache statistics are incremented according to the following rules:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>When a cache lookup encounters an existing cache entry {@code hitCount} is incremented.

import com.google.common.base.MoreObjects;
import com.google.common.base.Objects;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * Statistics about the performance of a {@link Cache}. Instances of this class are immutable.
 *
 * <p>Cache statistics are incremented according to the following rules:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>When a cache lookup encounters an existing cache entry {@code hitCount} is incremented.

// Expects key type of []byte for both signing and validation
type SigningMethodHMAC struct {
	Name       string
	Hash       crypto.Hash
	HasherPool sync.Pool
}

// Specific instances for HS256, HS384, HS512
var (
	SigningMethodHS256 *SigningMethodHMAC
	SigningMethodHS384 *SigningMethodHMAC
	SigningMethodHS512 *SigningMethodHMAC
)

const base64BufferSize = 64 * humanize.KiByte

var (

import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.RandomAccess;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Static methods pertaining to sorted {@link List} instances.
 *
 * <p>In this documentation, the terms <i>greatest</i>, <i>greater</i>, <i>least</i>, and
 * <i>lesser</i> are considered to refer to the comparator on the elements, and the terms

   * char[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<char[]> lexicographicalComparator() {
    return LexicographicalComparator.INSTANCE;
  }

  private enum LexicographicalComparator implements Comparator<char[]> {
    INSTANCE;

    @Override
    public int compare(char[] left, char[] right) {
      int minLength = Math.min(left.length, right.length);

 *         .onResultOf(getBarFunction)
 *         .nullsLast();
 * }</pre>
 *
 * Note that each chaining method returns a new ordering instance which is backed by the previous
 * instance, but has the chance to act on values <i>before</i> handing off to that backing instance.
 * As a result, it usually helps to read chained ordering expressions <i>backwards</i>. For example,
 * when {@code compare} is called on the above ordering:
 *

        }
      };

  enum NullListener implements RemovalListener<Object, Object> {
    INSTANCE;

    @Override
    public void onRemoval(RemovalNotification<Object, Object> notification) {}
  }

  enum OneWeigher implements Weigher<Object, Object> {
    INSTANCE;

    @Override
    public int weigh(Object key, Object value) {
      return 1;
    }
  }

    if (object instanceof HashCode) {
      HashCode that = (HashCode) object;
      return bits() == that.bits() && equalsSameBits(that);
    }
    return false;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a "Java hash code" for this {@code HashCode} instance; this is well-defined (so, for
   * example, you can safely put {@code HashCode} instances into a {@code HashSet}) but is otherwise

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

import static org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.contains;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.is;

/**
 * MavenMerger is based on same instances, subclasses should override KeyComputer per type
 *
 *
 */
class MavenMergerTest {
    private MavenMerger mavenMerger = new MavenMerger();

    @Test
    void mergeArtifactId() {