}
}

func TestScanToEmbedded(t *testing.T) {
	person1 := Person{Name: "person 1"}
	person2 := Person{Name: "person 2"}
	DB.Save(&person1).Save(&person2)

	address1 := Address{Name: "address 1"}
	address2 := Address{Name: "address 2"}
	DB.Save(&address1).Save(&address2)

	DB.Create(&PersonAddress{PersonID: person1.ID, AddressID: int(address1.ID)})

What inspired **FastAPI**, how it compares to alternatives and what it learned from them.

## Intro { #intro }

**FastAPI** wouldn't exist if not for the previous work of others.

There have been many tools created before that have helped inspire its creation.

I have been avoiding the creation of a new framework for several years. First I tried to solve all the features covered by **FastAPI** using many different frameworks, plug-ins, and tools.

	tx := DB.Begin()

	user := *GetUser("transaction-save-point", Config{})
	tx.Create(&user)

	if err := tx.First(&User{}, "name = ?", user.Name).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Should find saved record")
	}

	if err := tx.SavePoint("save_point1").Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Failed to save point, got error %v", err)
	}

	user1 := *GetUser("transaction-save-point-1", Config{})
	tx.Create(&user1)

rue,\"readFromDocValues\":true},{\"name\":\"clientIp\",\"type\":\"string\",\"esTypes\":[\"keyword\"],\"count\":0,\"scripted\":false,\"searchable\":true,\"aggregatable\":true,\"readFromDocValues\":true},{\"name\":\"createdAt\",\"type\":\"date\",\"esTypes\":[\"date\"],\"count\":0,\"scripted\":false,\"searchable\":true,\"aggregatable\":true,\"readFromDocValues\":true},{\"name\":\"docId\",\"type\":\"string\",\"esTypes\":[\"keyword\"],\"count\":0,\"scripted\":false,\"searchable\":true,\"aggregatable\...

{% endif %}

{% endfor %}

</div>

## Top Contributors

Here are the **Top Contributors**. 👷

These users have [created the most Pull Requests](help-fastapi.md#create-a-pull-request){.internal-link target=_blank} that have been *merged*.

They have contributed source code, documentation, etc. 📦

<div class="user-list user-list-center">

{% for user in (contributors.values() | list)[:50] %}

* **Uvicorn**:
    * Will have the best performance, as it doesn't have much extra code apart from the server itself.

                "tearDownTwo should have been run before tearDownOne", false, tearDownOne.ran);
          }
        };

    SimpleTearDown tearDownTwo = new SimpleTearDown(callback);
    stack.addTearDown(tearDownTwo);

    assertEquals(false, tearDownOne.ran);
    assertEquals(false, tearDownTwo.ran);

    stack.runTearDown();

    assertEquals("tearDownOne should have run", true, tearDownOne.ran);

import java.util.Date;

import org.codelibs.core.beans.Converter;
import org.codelibs.core.convert.StringConversionUtil;
import org.codelibs.core.convert.TimestampConversionUtil;

/**
 * Converter for timestamps.
 *
 * @author higa
 */
public class TimestampConverter implements Converter {

    /**
     * The pattern for the date and time.
     */
    protected String pattern;

* It should probably have a declaration of the body it should receive, e.g. `body: InvoiceEvent`.
* And it could also have a declaration of the response it should return, e.g. `response_model=InvoiceEventReceived`.

{* ../../docs_src/openapi_callbacks/tutorial001.py hl[16:18,21:22,28:32] *}

There are 2 main differences from a normal *path operation*:

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should have correct dialect codes for SMB2+ versions")
    void testDialectCodes() {
        // SMB1 should throw UnsupportedOperationException
        assertThrows(UnsupportedOperationException.class, () -> {
            DialectVersion.SMB1.getDialect();
        });

        // SMB2+ versions should have valid dialect codes
        assertTrue(DialectVersion.SMB202.getDialect() > 0);