* <ul>
   *   <li>If {@code exceptions} has a single exception and that exception is a {@link
   *       RuntimeException}, return it
   *   <li>If {@code exceptions} has a single exceptions and that exceptions is not a
   *       {@link RuntimeException}, return a simple {@code RuntimeException} that wraps it
   *   <li>Otherwise, return an instance of {@link ClusterException} that wraps the first exception

    /**
     * Test getTargetName() method with a string input.
     * Verifies that the original string is returned after encoding and decoding.
     */
    @Test
    void testGetTargetNameFromStringConstructor() {
        String targetName = "MyService/Host.Domain.com";
        AvTargetName avTargetName = new AvTargetName(targetName);

        // Verify that getTargetName returns the original string

  }

  /*
   * Our implementation works fine with a null `dir`. However, there's nothing in the documentation
   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I
   * see calls in Google code that pass a null `dir` to a FilenameFilter.... So let's declare the
   * parameter as non-nullable (since passing null to a FilenameFilter is unsafe in general), but if

 * extends {@code AbstractPackageSanityTests}. Currently sanity checks include {@link
 * NullPointerTester}, {@link EqualsTester} and {@link SerializableTester}. For example:
 *
 * <pre>
 * public class PackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {}
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>Note that only top-level classes with either a non-private constructor or a non-private static

     * frequently than that, and they may crawl pages marked "yearly" more
     * frequently than that. Crawlers may periodically crawl pages marked
     * "never" so that they can handle unexpected changes to those pages.
     */
    private String changefreq;

    /**
     * The priority of this URL relative to other URLs on your site. Valid

        break;
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Exactly like signalNextWaiter, but caller guarantees that guardToSkip need not be considered,
   * because caller has previously checked that guardToSkip.isSatisfied() returned false. An
   * optimization for the case that guardToSkip.isSatisfied() may be expensive.
   *

     all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the
     Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

  h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights
     under this Public License.

  i. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or
     process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such

         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our
         * new TypeVariable _will_ be equal to is an equivalent TypeVariable that was also created
         * by us. And that equality is guaranteed to hold because it doesn't involve the JDK
         * TypeVariable implementation at all.
         */

 *
 * <p>Example usage of {@code ComparisonChain}:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * public int compareTo(Foo that) {
 *   return ComparisonChain.start()
 *       .compare(this.aString, that.aString)
 *       .compare(this.anInt, that.anInt)
 *       .compare(this.anEnum, that.anEnum, Ordering.natural().nullsLast())
 *       .result();
 * }
 * }
 *

We could do better.

We can declare a `UserBase` model that serves as a base for our other models. And then we can make subclasses of that model that inherit its attributes (type declarations, validation, etc).

All the data conversion, validation, documentation, etc. will still work as normally.