suite.addTest(
        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
                  public Map<TypeToken, Object> create(Object... elements) {

  public void testTimeoutOnGetWorksCorrectly() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

    // The task thread waits for the latch, so we expect a timeout here.
    try {
      future.get(20, MILLISECONDS);
      fail("Should have timed out trying to get the value.");
    } catch (TimeoutException expected) {
    } finally {
      latch.countDown();
    }
  }

    }

    @Override
    public void displayHelp(ParserRequest request, Consumer<String> printStream) {
        super.displayHelp(request, printStream);
        printStream.accept("");
        // we have no DI here (to discover)
        printStream.accept("Goals:");
        printStream.accept("  help  - display this help message");
        printStream.accept("  check - check for available upgrades");

				}

				cfgEntry.Data = string(data)
			}
			configHistory = append(configHistory, cfgEntry)
			count--
			if count == 0 {
				break
			}
		}
		if !res.IsTruncated {
			// We are done here
			break
		}
		marker = res.NextMarker
	}
	sort.Slice(configHistory, func(i, j int) bool {
		return configHistory[i].CreateTime.Before(configHistory[j].CreateTime)
	})
	return configHistory, nil
}

    String reportItem(Item<?> item);
  }

  /**
   * A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs

How to contribute
=================

Thank you so much for wanting to contribute to Guava! Here are a few important
things you should know about contributing:

1.  API changes require discussion, use cases, etc. Code comes later.
2.  Pull requests are great for small fixes for bugs, documentation, etc.
3.  Pull requests are not merged directly into the master branch.
4.  Code contributions require signing a Google CLA.

API changes
-----------

* Return the updated model.

{* ../../docs_src/body_updates/tutorial002_py310.py hl[28:35] *}

/// tip

You can actually use this same technique with an HTTP `PUT` operation.

But the example here uses `PATCH` because it was created for these use cases.

///

/// note

Notice that the input model is still validated.

### Configure MinIO

```
export MINIO_ROOT_USER=minio
export MINIO_ROOT_PASSWORD=minio123
minio server /mnt/export
```

Here are all the available options to configure OpenID connect

```
mc admin config set myminio/ identity_openid

KEY:
identity_openid  enable OpenID SSO support

ARGS:

| Params        | Value                                          |

   * changes to it will <i>not</i> be reflected in this {@code HashCode} object or any other arrays
   * returned by this method.
   */
  // TODO(user): consider ByteString here, when that is available
  public abstract byte[] asBytes();

  /**
   * Copies bytes from this hash code into {@code dest}.
   *
   * @param dest the byte array into which the hash code will be written