nextStart = offset;
          continue;
        }

        if (limit == 1) {
          // The limit has been reached, return the rest of the string as the
          // final item. This is tested after empty string removal so that
          // empty strings do not count towards the limit.
          end = toSplit.length();
          offset = -1;
          // Since we may have changed the end, we need to trim it again.

import java.util.function.BiConsumer;
import java.util.stream.Collector;
import java.util.stream.Stream;
import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Unit test for {@code Sets}.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)

And as you can have parallelism and asynchronicity at the same time, you get higher performance than most of the tested NodeJS frameworks and on par with Go, which is a compiled language closer to C <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(all thanks to Starlette)</a>.

### Is concurrency better than parallelism?

		result ListObjectsInfo
		err    error
		// Flag indicating whether the test is expected to pass or not.
		shouldPass bool
	}{
		// Test cases with invalid bucket names ( Test number 1-4 ).
		{".test", "", "", "", 0, ListObjectsInfo{}, BucketNameInvalid{Bucket: ".test"}, false},
		{"Test", "", "", "", 0, ListObjectsInfo{}, BucketNameInvalid{Bucket: "Test"}, false},

 * "https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/ImmutableCollectionsExplained">immutable collections</a>.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 12.0
 */
@GwtIncompatible // hasn't been tested yet
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public abstract class ImmutableSortedMultiset<E> extends ImmutableMultiset<E>
    implements SortedMultiset<E> {
  // TODO(lowasser): GWT compatibility

  /**

  }

  /**
   * Removes, from an iterable, every element that satisfies the provided predicate.
   *
   * <p>Removals may or may not happen immediately as each element is tested against the predicate.
   * The behavior of this method is not specified if {@code predicate} is dependent on {@code
   * removeFrom}.
   *

lir/tfrt/python_tests,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/ifrt,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/mlrt,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/ir,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/analysis,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/jit,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/lhlo_to_tfrt,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/lhlo_to_jitrt,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/tf_to_corert,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/tf_to_tfrt_data,tensorflow/compiler/mlir/tfrt/tests/...

* <a href="https://hub.docker.com/_/redis" class="external-link" target="_blank">Redis</a>, etc.

Usando imagens de contêiner pré-prontas é muito fácil **combinar** e usar diferentes ferramentas. Por exemplo, para testar um novo banco de dados. Em muitos casos, você pode usar as **imagens oficiais** precisando somente de variáveis de ambiente para configurá-las.

		case err == nil && n != int64(test.length):
			t.Errorf("Test %d: %d bytes were expected, but %d were written", i, test.length, n)
		case err == nil && !bytes.Equal(data[test.offset:test.offset+test.length], buffer):
			t.Errorf("Test %d: Expected bytes: %v, but got: %v", i, data[test.offset:test.offset+test.length], buffer)
		case err != nil && err != test.expError:

   * elements without resizing. Note that this is not what {@link HashSet#HashSet(int)} does, but it
   * is what most users want and expect it to do.
   *
   * <p>This behavior can't be broadly guaranteed, but has been tested with OpenJDK 1.7 and 1.8.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of elements you expect to add to the returned set
   * @return a new, empty hash set with enough capacity to hold {@code expectedSize} elements