// There is no contract one way or another as long as isSubtypeOf() works as expected.
          combined.addAll(asList(typeParam.getBounds()));
          if (combined.size() > 1) { // Object is implicit and only useful if it's the only bound.
            combined.remove(Object.class);
          }
          return super.captureAsTypeVariable(combined.toArray(new Type[0]));
        }
      };
    }

Creo que `Union[SomeType, None]` es más explícito sobre lo que significa.

Se trata solo de las palabras y nombres. Pero esas palabras pueden afectar cómo tú y tus compañeros de equipo piensan sobre el código.

Como ejemplo, tomemos esta función:

     * For example, if a Java tools accepts only class-path elements, then the filter should return
     * {@code true} for {@link JavaPathType#CLASSES} and {@code false} for {@link JavaPathType#MODULES}.
     * If no filter is explicitly set, then the default is a filter accepting everything.
     *
     * @return a filter for the types of path (class-path, module-path, …) accepted by the tool
     */
    @Nullable

      reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
      the conditions stated in this License.

   5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
      any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
      by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.

      reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
      the conditions stated in this License.

   5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
      any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
      by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.

   * Supplier#get} on that supplier.
   *
   * <p>Prefer to use the method reference {@code Supplier::get} instead, though note that it is not
   * serializable unless you explicitly make it {@link Serializable}, typically by writing {@code
   * (Function<Supplier<T>, T> & Serializable) Supplier::get}.
   *
   * @since 8.0
   */

		}
		return
	}

	if result.Dynamic {
		applyDynamic(ctx, objectAPI, result.Cfg, result.SubSys, r, w)
		// If logger webhook config updated (proxy due to callhome), explicitly dynamically
		// apply the config
		if result.LoggerWebhookCfgUpdated {
			applyDynamic(ctx, objectAPI, result.Cfg, config.LoggerWebhookSubSys, r, w)
		}
	}

	writeSuccessResponseHeadersOnly(w)
}

   * Supplier#get} on that supplier.
   *
   * <p>Prefer to use the method reference {@code Supplier::get} instead, though note that it is not
   * serializable unless you explicitly make it {@link Serializable}, typically by writing {@code
   * (Function<Supplier<T>, T> & Serializable) Supplier::get}.
   *
   * @since 8.0
   */

      reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
      the conditions stated in this License.

   5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
      any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
      by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.

Eu penso que `Union[SomeType, None]` é mais explícito sobre o que ele significa.

Isso é apenas sobre palavras e nomes. Mas estas palavras podem afetar como os seus colegas de trabalho pensam sobre o código.

Por exemplo, vamos pegar esta função: