navigate to the
[GitHub "issues" tab](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues) and start
looking through interesting issues. If you are not sure of where to start, then
start by trying one of the smaller/easier issues here i.e.
[issues with the "good first issue" label](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/labels/good%20first%20issue)
and then take a look at the

		s.writeErrorResponse(w, err)
		return false
	}

	diskID := r.Form.Get(storageRESTDiskID)
	if diskID == "" {
		// Request sent empty disk-id, we allow the request
		// as the peer might be coming up and trying to read format.json
		// or create format.json
		return true
	}

	storedDiskID, err := s.getStorage().GetDiskID()
	if err != nil {
		s.writeErrorResponse(w, err)
		return false
	}

  private final long totalLoadTime;

  private final long evictionCount;

  /**
   * Constructs a new {@code CacheStats} instance.
   *
   * <p>Five parameters of the same type in a row is a bad thing, but this class is not constructed
   * by end users and is too fine-grained for a builder.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("GoodTime") // should accept a java.time.Duration
  public CacheStats(
      long hitCount,

     * crc2 = int2
     * crc3 = int3
     *
     * ...so we set crc0 so that computeForWord(crc0) = -1 and xoring it with the first int
     * gives us the desired result.  computeForWord(0) == 0, so all the others do the right thing.
     */
    private int crc0 = INVERSE_COMPUTE_FOR_WORD_OF_ALL_1S;
    private int crc1 = 0;
    private int crc2 = 0;
    private int crc3 = 0;

    @Override
    protected void process(ByteBuffer bb) {

   *       List#add}, or functional update methods such as {@link
   *       com.google.common.base.Joiner#skipNulls}.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that constructors taking a builder object cannot be tested effectively because
   * semantics of builder can be arbitrarily complex. Still, a factory class can be created in the
   * test to facilitate equality testing. For example:
   *
   * <pre>

  //      since, after all, this class is also a reentrant mutual exclusion lock!?

  /*
   * One of the key challenges of this class is to prevent lost signals, while trying hard to
   * minimize unnecessary signals. One simple and correct algorithm is to signal some other waiter
   * with a satisfied guard (if one exists) whenever any thread occupying the monitor exits the

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableIntArray.of(1, 3))
        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableIntArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableIntArray iia = ImmutableIntArray.of(0, 1, 3);
    assertDoesntActuallyTrim(iia);

      Iterable<? extends R> rowKeys, Iterable<? extends C> columnKeys) {
    return new ArrayTable<>(rowKeys, columnKeys);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(jlevy): Add factory methods taking an Enum class, instead of an
   * iterable, to specify the allowed row keys and/or column keys. Note that
   * custom serialization logic is needed to support different enum sizes during
   * serialization and deserialization.

Don't worry, with the way the code is structured, we'll make sure we use **a single SQLModel *session* per request** later, this is actually what the `check_same_thread` is trying to achieve.

### Create the Tables { #create-the-tables }

We then add a function that uses `SQLModel.metadata.create_all(engine)` to **create the tables** for all the *table models*.

    assertThat(sendPingFrame(true, expectedPayload1, expectedPayload2)).isEqualTo(frame)
    reader.nextFrame(
      requireSettings = false,
      object : BaseTestHandler() {
        override fun ping(
          ack: Boolean,
          payload1: Int,
          payload2: Int,
        ) {
          assertThat(ack).isTrue()
          assertThat(payload1).isEqualTo(expectedPayload1)