"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
      the copyright owner that is granting the License.

      "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by the 
copyright owner that is granting the License. 

"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all other 
entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with 
that entity. For the purposes of this definition, "control" means (i) the 
power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such 

   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely
   *       to lead to trouble than an incompatible change would be.
   *   <li>We could make {@link #countMap} no longer be {@code final}. Then we could write to it
   *       directly during deserialization. However, we would lose Java's guarantees for {@code
   *       final} fields, including that their values are guaranteed to be visible even when an

[using Guava in your build]: https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/UseGuavaInYourBuild
[repackage]: https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/UseGuavaInYourBuild#what-if-i-want-to-use-beta-apis-from-a-library-that-people-use-as-a-dependency

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

TF_CAPI_EXPORT int TF_PickUnusedPortOrDie(void);

// Fast path method that makes constructing a single scalar tensor require less
// overhead and copies.
TF_CAPI_EXPORT extern TFE_TensorHandle* TFE_NewTensorHandleFromScalar(
    TF_DataType data_type, void* data, size_t len, TF_Status* status);

// Specify the server_def that enables collective ops.
// This is different to the above function in that it doesn't create remote

      "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
      the copyright owner that is granting the License.

      "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the

      "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
      the copyright owner that is granting the License.

      "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the

  // in the short hash. We saw that a mask of 0x7f would keep the 7-bit value 0x6f from a full
  // hashcode of 0x89abcdef. The imaginary `hash` value would then be the remaining top 25 bits,
  // 0x89abcd80. To this is added (or'd) the `next` value, which is an index within `entries`
  // (and therefore within `keys` and `values`) of another entry that has the same short hash