* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */

package model

import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper
import com.fasterxml.jackson.module.kotlin.readValue
import com.fasterxml.jackson.module.kotlin.registerKotlinModule
import java.io.File

val ignoredSubprojects =
    listOf(
        "soak", // soak test

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

      System.out.println(response.body().string());
    }
  }

  @Test
  public void testModules() {
    Module okHttpModule = OkHttpClient.class.getModule();
    assertEquals("okhttp3", okHttpModule.getName());
    assertTrue(okHttpModule.getPackages().contains("okhttp3"));

    Module loggingInterceptorModule = HttpLoggingInterceptor.class.getModule();
    assertEquals("okhttp3.logging", loggingInterceptorModule.getName());

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

{* ../../docs_src/stream_json_lines/tutorial001_py310.py ln[1:24] hl[24] *}

Si chaque élément JSON que vous voulez renvoyer est de type `Item` (un modèle Pydantic) et que c'est une fonction async, vous pouvez déclarer le type de retour comme `AsyncIterable[Item]` :

{* ../../docs_src/stream_json_lines/tutorial001_py310.py ln[1:24] hl[9:11,22] *}

Ardından request’i doğrudan kullanıp body’yi `bytes` olarak çıkarıyoruz. Bu da FastAPI’nin request payload’ını JSON olarak parse etmeye çalışmayacağı anlamına gelir.

Sonrasında kodumuzda bu YAML içeriğini doğrudan parse ediyor, ardından YAML içeriğini doğrulamak için yine aynı Pydantic modeli kullanıyoruz:

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <artifactId>parent</artifactId>
  <version>11-SNAPSHOT</version>

  <name>Model urls inheritance test parent</name>
  <description>MNG-5951 MNG-6059 child.x.y.inherit.append.path="false" for each url to avoid automatic path addition when inheriting</description>

  <modules>
    <module>../inheritance</module>
  </modules>

  <!-- 5 urls in the pom to configure for not adding path -->

      description: |
        Requesting we remove a module here only hides the generated documentation on pkg.go.dev.
        It does not affect the behaviour of proxy.golang.org or the go command.
        Instead we recommend using the retract directive which will be processed by all 3 of the above.

        If you have deleted your repo, please recreate it and publish a retraction.