import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link TreeMultiset}.
 *
 * @author Neal Kanodia
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public class TreeMultisetTest extends TestCase {

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // suite
  public static Test suite() {

        p.setProperty("jcifs.netbios.cachePolicy", "1200");
        /*
         * The Filter can only work with NTLMv1 as it uses a man-in-the-middle
         * technique that NTLMv2 specifically thwarts. A real NTLM Filter would
         * need to do a NETLOGON RPC that JCIFS will likely never implement
         * because it requires a lot of extra crypto not used by CIFS.
         */

  }

  dlm_tensor->dl_tensor.shape = shape_arr->data();
  // There are two ways to represent compact row-major data
  // 1) nullptr indicates tensor is compact and row-majored.
  // 2) fill in the strides array as the real case for compact row-major data.
  // Here we choose option 2, since some frameworks didn't handle the strides
  // argument properly.
  dlm_tensor->dl_tensor.strides = stride_arr->data();

   *     the size method
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Collection<T> misleadingSizeCollection(int delta) {
    // It would be nice to be able to return a real concurrent
    // collection like ConcurrentLinkedQueue, so that e.g. concurrent
    // iteration would work, but that would not be GWT-compatible.

    assertThat(newArray).isEqualTo(new byte[] {(byte) 0, (byte) 1, (byte) 2});
    newArray[1] = (byte) 5;
    assertThat((byte) list.get(1)).isEqualTo((byte) 1);
  }

  // This test stems from a real bug found by andrewk
  public void testAsList_subList_toArray_roundTrip() {
    byte[] array = {(byte) 0, (byte) 1, (byte) 2, (byte) 3};
    List<Byte> list = Bytes.asList(array);

`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�`�&�m�Size�
6m:M�MTime�|>���e��MetaSys��6X-Minio-Internal-Server-Side-Encryption-Seal-Algorithm�DAREv2-HMAC-SHA256�&x-minio-internal-replication-timestamp�2023-08-18T00:09:42.389168293Z�#x-minio-internal-replication-status�^arn:minio:replication::36280125-1e9d-414e-bff5-8c88a1b5352e:disney-prod-vod-repository=FAILED;�5X-Minio-Int...

The built-in function <code>complex</code> constructs a complex
value from a floating-point real and imaginary part, while
<code>real</code> and <code>imag</code>
extract the real and imaginary parts of a complex value.
</p>

<pre class="grammar">
complex(realPart, imaginaryPart floatT) complexT
real(complexT) floatT
imag(complexT) floatT
</pre>

<p>

    }

    private ModelVersionParser newModelVersionParser() {
        // This is a limited parser that does not support ranges and compares versions as strings
        // in real-life this parser should not be used, but replaced with a proper one
        return new ModelVersionParser() {
            @Override
            public Version parseVersion(String version) {

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * {@link LoadingCache} tests that deal with caches that actually contain some key-value mappings.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */

public class PopulatedCachesTest extends TestCase {

   * The problem with these is that remove(K, long) has to be done in two phases by definition ---
   * first decrementing to zero, and then removing. putIfAbsent or replace could observe the
   * intermediate zero-state. Ways we could deal with this are:
   *
   * - Don't define any of the ConcurrentMap operations. This is the current state of affairs.
   *
   * - Define putIfAbsent and replace as treating zero and absent identically (as currently