}

        @Test
        @DisplayName("list propagates SmbUnsupportedOperationException from doEnum")
        void list_propagatesUnsupportedOperationException() throws Exception {
            // Arrange: same setup as above to force doEnum -> SmbUnsupportedOperationException
            SmbFile parent = mock(SmbFile.class, RETURNS_DEEP_STUBS);
            SmbResourceLocator locator = mock(SmbResourceLocator.class);

        byte[] buffer2 = new byte[200];
        int encoded2 = request2.encode(buffer2, 0);
        assertEquals(request2.size(), encoded2);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test multiple encodes produce same result")
    void testMultipleEncodesProduceSameResult() {
        // Setup
        String pipeName = "RepeatedEncode";
        long timeout = 3000L;

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

```

</div>

It will serve the documentation on `http://127.0.0.1:8008`.

That way, you can edit the documentation/source files and see the changes live.

/// tip

Alternatively, you can perform the same steps that scripts does manually.

Go into the language directory, for the main docs in English it's at `docs/en/`:

```console
$ cd docs/en/
```

Then run `mkdocs` in that directory:

```console

    }

    public void test_intervalRule_isTarget_crossMidnight() {
        IntervalRule rule = new IntervalRule("22:00", "02:00", "*", 1000);

        // Within range (same day)
        assertTrue(rule.isTarget(23, 30, 1)); // 23:30 on Sunday
        assertTrue(rule.isTarget(22, 0, 1)); // 22:00 on Sunday (start time)

        // Within range (next day)

 * single character '{@code \}{@code u1000}' will require approximately 16K of memory. If you need
 * to create multiple escaper instances that have the same character replacement mapping consider
 * using {@link ArrayBasedEscaperMap}.
 *
 * @author David Beaumont
 * @since 15.0
 */
@GwtCompatible

   *       CacheLoader#loadAll bulk loading implementations}
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> For any given key, every {@code loader} used with it should compute the same
   * value. Otherwise, a call that passes one {@code loader} may return the result of another call
   * with a differently behaving {@code loader}. For example, a call that requests a short timeout

    val sslContext = get().newSSLContext()
    sslContext.init(null, null, null)

    // new client, may share all same fields but likely different connection pool
    assertNotSame(
      client.routeDatabase,
      OkHttpClient
        .Builder()
        .build()
        .routeDatabase,
    )

    // same client with no change affecting route db
    assertSame(
      client.routeDatabase,
      client

   *
   * TODO(cpovirk): Could this be simplified if we modified implementations of LegacyConverter to
   * override methods (probably called "unsafeDoForward" and "unsafeDoBackward") with the same
   * signatures as the methods below, rather than overriding the same doForward and doBackward
   * methods as implementations of normal converters do?
   *
   * But no matter what we do, it's worth remembering that the resulting code is going to be unsound

 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *