*     such index exists.
   */
  public static int indexOf(float[] array, float target) {
    return indexOf(array, target, 0, array.length);
  }

  // TODO(kevinb): consider making this public
  private static int indexOf(float[] array, float target, int start, int end) {
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
      if (array[i] == target) {
        return i;
      }
    }

      case 1:
        Entry<? extends K, ? extends V> entry = getOnlyElement(entries);
        return of((K) entry.getKey(), (V) entry.getValue());
      default:
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // TODO(cpovirk): Consider storing an Entry<?, ?>[].
        Entry<K, V>[] entryArray = entries.toArray((Entry<K, V>[]) new Entry<?, ?>[entries.size()]);
        return new RegularImmutableMap<K, V>(throwIfDuplicateKeys, entryArray);
    }
  }

@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableTable, HashBasedTable, or another implementation")
@GwtCompatible
public interface Table<
    R extends @Nullable Object, C extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object> {
  // TODO(jlevy): Consider adding methods similar to ConcurrentMap methods.

  // Accessors

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if the table contains a mapping with the specified row and column keys.
   *

   * bufferSize ≥ k, then we can ignore any elements greater than this value.
   */
  private @Nullable T threshold;

  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // TODO(cpovirk): Consider storing Object[] instead of T[].
  private TopKSelector(Comparator<? super T> comparator, int k) {
    this.comparator = checkNotNull(comparator, "comparator");
    this.k = k;

     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls
     * that can lead to NullPointerException. That's unfortunate. But hopefully most Kotlin callers

 * requests, responding to them with {@link #notifyStarted()} and {@link #notifyStopped()}
 * callbacks. Its subclasses must manage threads manually; consider {@link
 * AbstractExecutionThreadService} if you need only a single execution thread.
 *
 * @author Jesse Wilson
 * @author Luke Sandberg
 * @since 1.0
 */
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ktIncompatible

      <T> Facade<T> newFacade() {
        return new OldAbstractFutureFacade<T>();
      }
    };

    abstract <T> Facade<T> newFacade();
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck") // TODO: b/175898629 - Consider onSpinWait.
  static void awaitWaiting(Thread t) {
    while (true) {
      Thread.State state = t.getState();
      switch (state) {
        case RUNNABLE:
        case BLOCKED:
          Thread.yield();

/// tip

If you are already using **FastAPI** version **0.99.0 or above**, you can probably **skip** these details.

They are more relevant for older versions, before OpenAPI 3.1.0 was available.

You can consider this a brief OpenAPI and JSON Schema **history lesson**. 🤓

///

/// warning

These are very technical details about the standards **JSON Schema** and **OpenAPI**.

   *     such index exists.
   */
  public static int indexOf(double[] array, double target) {
    return indexOf(array, target, 0, array.length);
  }

  // TODO(kevinb): consider making this public
  private static int indexOf(double[] array, double target, int start, int end) {
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
      if (array[i] == target) {
        return i;
      }
    }

  // 'inputFuture'. That field is non-final and non-volatile. There are 2 places where the
  // 'inputFuture' field is read and where we will have to consider visibility of the write
  // operation in the constructor.
  //
  // 1. In the listener that performs the callback. In this case it is fine since inputFuture is