* errors by throwing an {@link Exception}. Error conditions should provide
     * sufficient detail to aid troubleshooting.</p>
     *
     * @throws Exception if any issue occurs that prevents the successful execution
     *                   of the Mojo
     */
    void execute() throws Exception;

     * Bindings are in the form:
     * proto:\\server[key1=val1,key2=val2]
     * or
     * proto:server[key1=val1,key2=val2]
     * or
     * proto:[key1=val1,key2=val2]
     *
     * If a key is absent it is assumed to be 'endpoint'. Thus the
     * following are equivalent:
     * proto:\\ts0.win.net[endpoint=\pipe\srvsvc]
     * proto:ts0.win.net[\pipe\srvsvc]
     *
     * If the server is absent it is set to "127.0.0.1"
     */

	//
	// When reading, an extended timestamp is preferred over the legacy MS-DOS
	// date field, and the offset between the times is used as the timezone.
	// If only the MS-DOS date is present, the timezone is assumed to be UTC.
	//
	// When writing, an extended timestamp (which is timezone-agnostic) is
	// always emitted. The legacy MS-DOS date field is encoded according to the
	// location of the Modified time.
	Modified time.Time

I (the author, [@tiangolo](https://x.com/tiangolo)) will review it thoroughly and get back to you.

## Public Discussions

Please restrain from publicly discussing a potential security vulnerability. 🙊

OAuth2 especifica que ao usar o "password flow" (fluxo de senha), que estamos usando, o cliente/usuário deve enviar os campos `username` e `password` como dados do formulário.

E a especificação diz que os campos devem ser nomeados assim. Portanto, `user-name` ou `email` não funcionariam.

Mas não se preocupe, você pode mostrá-lo como quiser aos usuários finais no frontend.

E seus modelos de banco de dados podem usar qualquer outro nome que você desejar.

            assertTrue(e.getMessage().contains("Invalid negotiate context data length") || e.getMessage().contains("Buffer too small")
                    || e.getMessage().contains("negotiate context"), "Validation detected issue: " + e.getMessage());
        }
    }

    /**
     * Test negotiate context buffer overflow protection.
     */
    @Test
    public void testNegotiateContextBufferOverflow() {

* Ahora, si eso resolvió su problema, puedes pedirles que:

    * En GitHub Discussions: marquen el comentario como la **respuesta**.
    * En GitHub Issues: **cierren** el issue.

## Observa el repositorio de GitHub

		if pool.Decommission == nil {
			continue
		}
		if pool.Decommission.Complete || pool.Decommission.Canceled {
			// Do not resume decommission upon startup for
			// - decommission complete
			// - decommission canceled
			continue
		} // In all other situations we need to resume
		newPools = append(newPools, pool)
	}
	return newPools
}

func (p *poolMeta) DecommissionComplete(idx int) bool {

* Update "new issue" templates. PR [#749](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/749).
* Fix serialization of errors for exotic Pydantic types. PR [#748](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/748) by [@dmontagu](https://github.com/dmontagu).

## 0.44.0

* Add GitHub action [Issue Manager](https://github.com/tiangolo/issue-manager). PR [#742](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/742).

     */
    @Override
    public boolean isSameTree(final SmbTreeHandle th) {
        if (!(th instanceof SmbTreeHandleImpl)) {
            return false;
        }
        return this.treeConnection.isSame(((SmbTreeHandleImpl) th).treeConnection);
    }

    @Override
    public int getSendBufferSize() throws SmbException {