* returned.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if another entry in the bucket has the same key and {@code
   *     throwIfDuplicateKeys} is true
   * @throws BucketOverflowException if this bucket has too many entries, which may indicate a hash
   *     flooding attack
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <K, V> @Nullable ImmutableMapEntry<K, V> checkNoConflictInKeyBucket(
      Object key,
      Object newValue,

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/** Tests for {@link AbstractSequentialIterator}. */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class AbstractSequentialIteratorTest extends TestCase {
  @GwtIncompatible // Too slow
  public void testDoublerExhaustive() {
    new IteratorTester<Integer>(
        3, UNMODIFIABLE, ImmutableList.of(1, 2), IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override

                + expected
                + ", actual = "
                + actual);
      }
    }

    if (expectedIter.hasNext() || actualIter.hasNext()) {
      // actual either had too few or too many elements
      fail(
          "contents were not equal and in the same order: "
              + "expected = "
              + expected
              + ", actual = "
              + actual);
    }

   * [Call.request] is a redirect to a different address.
   *
   * Prior to OkHttp 4.3 this was incorrectly invoked when the client was ready to read headers.
   * This was misleading for tracing because it was too early.
   */
  open fun responseHeadersStart(call: Call) {
  }

  /**
   * Invoked immediately after receiving response headers.
   *
   * This method is always invoked after [responseHeadersStart].

      if (digit == -1) {
        throw new NumberFormatException(string);
      }
      if (pos > maxSafePos && ParseOverflowDetection.overflowInParse(value, digit, radix)) {
        throw new NumberFormatException("Too large for unsigned long: " + string);
      }
      value = (value * radix) + digit;
    }

    return value;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the unsigned {@code long} value represented by the given string.

      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override

        .addHeader("Retry-After", "1")
        .body("You took too long!")
        .onResponseEnd(ShutdownConnection)
        .build(),
    )
    val request = Request(server.url("/"))
    val response = client.newCall(request).execute()
    assertThat(response.body.string()).isEqualTo("You took too long!")
  }

  @Test
  fun requestBodyRetransmittedOnClientRequestTimeout() {

        .withFeatures(features)
        .suppressing(parentBuilder.getSuppressedTests())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  /**
   * Returns an array of four bogus elements that will always be too high or too low for the
   * display. This includes two values for each extreme.
   *
   * <p>This method (dangerously) assume that the strings {@code "!! a"} and {@code "~~ z"} will

   * MyList} to save space. So long as {@code MyList} has all the public supertypes of {@code
   * MySubList}, this is safe. For these cases, for which {@code reserializeAndAssert} is too
   * strict, use {@link #reserialize}.
   *
   * @return the re-serialized object
   * @throws RuntimeException if the specified object was not successfully serialized or
   *     deserialized

 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?
 *   <li>In at least one case, a use of {@code sun.misc.FpUtils}, the test will not even
 *       <i>compile</i> against Android. Now, this might be an artifact of our build system, one