func (api objectAPIHandlers) getObjectInArchiveFileHandler(ctx context.Context, objectAPI ObjectLayer, bucket, object string, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
	if crypto.S3.IsRequested(r.Header) || crypto.S3KMS.IsRequested(r.Header) { // If SSE-S3 or SSE-KMS present -> AWS fails with undefined error
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrBadRequest), r.URL)
		return
	}

	case "CRC32":
		return ChecksumCRC32
	case "CRC32C":
		return ChecksumCRC32C
	case "SHA1":
		return ChecksumSHA1
	case "SHA256":
		return ChecksumSHA256
	case "CRC64NVME":
		// AWS seems to ignore full value, and just assume it.
		return ChecksumCRC64NVME
	case "":
		return ChecksumNone
	}
	return ChecksumInvalid
}

        NullPointerException.class, () -> multimap().putAll(k3(), newArrayList(null, v3())));

    /*
     * In principle, a Multimap implementation could add e3 first before failing on the null. But
     * that seems unlikely enough to be worth complicating the test over, especially if there's any
     * chance that a permissive test could mask a bug.
     */
    expectUnchanged();

    attributes:
      value: >
        #### Ubiquity: provide concrete use cases


        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this feature in a real-world scenario, or is it
        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case

        }
        checkExceptionClassValidity(exceptionClass);

        /*
         * It's very unlikely that any loaded Futures class will see getChecked called with more
         * than a handful of exceptions. But it seems prudent to set a cap on how many we'll cache.
         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.

        )

        if pr.state == "open" and awaiting_label in label_strs:
            logging.info(
                f"This PR seems to be a language translation and awaiting reviews: #{pr.number}"
            )
            if already_notified_comment:
                logging.info(

      ).build()
  }

  private fun buildServerSslSocketFactory(): SSLSocketFactory {
    // The test uses JDK default SSL Context instead of the Platform provided one
    // as Conscrypt seems to have some differences, we only want to test client side here.
    return try {
      val keyManager =
        newKeyManager(
          null,
          serverCert,
          serverIntermediateCa.certificate,

						<goals>
							<goal>check</goal>
						</goals>
					</execution>
				</executions>
				<configuration>
					<failOnError>false</failOnError>
					<ignored>
						<difference>
							<!-- seems to be a clirr bug that it cannot handle the different inherited 
								return types -->
							<className>**</className>
							<differenceType>7006</differenceType>
							<method>*</method>
							<from>*</from>

    // parseable, but the spec doesn't seem to say which exception is thrown for an invalid radix.
    // In contrast to the JVM, Kotlin native throws an Illegal argument exception in this case
    // (which seems to make more sense).
    try {
      UnsignedInts.parseUnsignedInt("0", Character.MIN_RADIX - 1);
      fail();
    } catch (NumberFormatException expected) {
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {

      /*
       * I assume that this check can't fail because JELLY_BEAN will be present only if we're
       * running under Jelly Bean or higher. But it seems safest to check.
       */
      if (version < jellyBean) {
        return new ThrowingCreator();
      }
    } catch (ReflectiveOperationException e) {