@Override
          protected char[] escapeUnsafe(char c) {
            return ("{" + c + "}").toCharArray();
          }
        };
    EscaperAsserts.assertBasic(wrappingEscaper);
    // '[' and '@' lie either side of [A-Z].
    assertThat(wrappingEscaper.escape("[FOO@BAR]")).isEqualTo("{[}FOO{@}BAR{]}");
  }

  public void testSafeRange_maxLessThanMin() throws IOException {
    // Basic escaping of unsafe chars (wrap them in {,}'s)

  }

  /**
   * Configures the given map maker to use weak keys, if possible; does nothing otherwise (i.e., in
   * GWT). This is sometimes acceptable, when only server-side code could generate enough volume
   * that reclamation becomes important.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  static MapMaker tryWeakKeys(MapMaker mapMaker) {
    return mapMaker.weakKeys();
  }

       * instance.
       */
      super("");
    }

    @Override
    Comparable<?> endpoint() {
      throw new IllegalStateException("range unbounded on this side");
    }

    @Override
    boolean isLessThan(Comparable<?> value) {
      return true;
    }

    @Override
    BoundType typeAsLowerBound() {
      throw new IllegalStateException();
    }

  }

  /**
   * Configures the given map maker to use weak keys, if possible; does nothing otherwise (i.e., in
   * GWT). This is sometimes acceptable, when only server-side code could generate enough volume
   * that reclamation becomes important.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  static MapMaker tryWeakKeys(MapMaker mapMaker) {
    return mapMaker.weakKeys();
  }

						<span class="favorited"><i class="fas fa-star"></i></span>
					</c:if>
				</div>
			</li>
		</c:forEach>
	</ol>
	<aside class="col-md-4 d-none d-md-block">
		<%-- Side Content --%>
		<c:if test="${facetResponse != null}">
			<c:forEach var="fieldData" items="${facetResponse.fieldList}">
				<c:if
					test="${fieldData.name == 'label' && fieldData.valueCountMap.size() > 0}">

   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *

  integrity sha512-7++dFhtcx3353uBaq8DDR4NuxBetBzC7ZQOhmTQInHEd6bSrXdiEyzCvG07Z44UYdLShWUyXt5M/yhz8ekcb1A==

side-channel@^1.0.4:
  version "1.0.4"
  resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/side-channel/-/side-channel-1.0.4.tgz#efce5c8fdc104ee751b25c58d4290011fa5ea2cf"
  integrity sha512-q5XPytqFEIKHkGdiMIrY10mvLRvnQh42/+GoBlFW3b2LXLE2xxJpZFdm94we0BaoV3RwJyGqg5wS7epxTv0Zvw==

   */
  inner class FramingSource internal constructor(
    /** Maximum number of bytes to buffer before reporting a flow control error. */
    private val maxByteCount: Long,
    /**
     * True if either side has cleanly shut down this stream. We will receive no more bytes beyond
     * those already in the buffer.
     */
    internal var finished: Boolean,
  ) : Source {

     * regrettable implementations like our own Sets.filter, Collection.size() is sometimes a
     * linear-time operation, and it can even have side effects. Thus, we limit the special case to
     * List, which is _even more likely_ to have size() implemented to be fast and side-effect-free.
     *
     * We could consider recognizing specific other collections as safe (like ImmutableCollection,

       * need to clear our reference to the TimeoutFuture is the reason we use a *static* nested
       * class with a manual reference back to the "containing" class.)
       *
       * This has the nice-ish side effect of limiting reentrancy: run() calls
       * timeoutFuture.setException() calls run(). That reentrancy would already be harmless, since
       * timeoutFuture can be set (and delegate cancelled) only once. (And "set only once" is