///

```Python hl_lines="7"
{!> ../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001.py!}
```

////

For example, in one of the ways the OAuth2 specification can be used (called "password flow") it is required to send a `username` and `password` as form fields.

The <abbr title="specification">spec</abbr> requires the fields to be exactly named `username` and `password`, and to be sent as form fields, not JSON.

```Python hl_lines="7"
{!> ../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001.py!}
```

////

Zum Beispiel stellt eine der Möglichkeiten, die OAuth2 Spezifikation zu verwenden (genannt <abbr title='„Passwort-Fluss“'>„password flow“</abbr>), die Bedingung, einen `username` und ein `password` als Formularfelder zu senden.

    * HTTP Digest, usw.
* `oauth2`: Alle OAuth2-Methoden zum Umgang mit Sicherheit (genannt „Flows“).
    * Mehrere dieser Flows eignen sich zum Aufbau eines OAuth 2.0-Authentifizierungsanbieters (wie Google, Facebook, Twitter, GitHub usw.):
        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`

    * HTTP Digest, etc.
* `oauth2`: all the OAuth2 ways to handle security (called "flows").
    * Several of these flows are appropriate for building an OAuth 2.0 authentication provider (like Google, Facebook, Twitter, GitHub, etc):
        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`
    * But there is one specific "flow" that can be perfectly used for handling authentication in the same application directly:

	}
	return p.roleArn.String()
}

// UserInfo returns claims for authenticated user from userInfo endpoint.
//
// Some OIDC implementations such as GitLab do not support
// claims as part of the normal oauth2 flow, instead rely
// on service providers making calls to IDP to fetch additional
// claims available from the UserInfo endpoint

API, and MinIO verifies this token by sending it to the Identity Management Plugin webhook. This plugin responds with some information and MinIO is able to generate temporary STS credentials to interact with object storage.

The authentication flow is similar to that of OpenID, however the token is "opaque" to MinIO - it is simply sent to the plugin for verification. CAVEAT: There is no console UI integration for this method of authentication and it is intended primarily for machine authentication....

typedef struct TF_AbstractOp TF_AbstractOp;

// Stores a function representation that can be used for execution or for
// setting functional attributes of other composite ops e.g. control flow.
typedef struct TF_AbstractFunction TF_AbstractFunction;

// This allows the client to swap the implementation of the tracing engine.
// Any future call to TF_CreateFunction will use the implementation defined
// here.

      </Credentials>
   </AssumeRoleWithCertificateResult>
   <ResponseMetadata>
      <RequestId>169339CD8B3A6948</RequestId>
   </ResponseMetadata>
</AssumeRoleWithCertificateResponse>
```

## Authentication Flow

A client can request temp. S3 credentials via the STS API. It can authenticate via a client certificate and obtain a access/secret key pair as well as a session token. These credentials are associated to an S3 policy at the MinIO server.

#### Conclusion

Overall, the high level config ingestion flow:

```mermaid
graph TD
    sd(Service Discovery)
    cs(ConfigStore)
    ep(Endpoints)
    pc(PushContext)
    sd-->pc
    cs-->pc
    sd-->ep
```

### Config Translation

  {
    "name": "files",
    "path": "platforms/core-runtime/files",
    "unitTests": true,
    "functionalTests": false,
    "crossVersionTests": false
  },
  {
    "name": "flow-services",
    "path": "platforms/core-configuration/flow-services",
    "unitTests": false,
    "functionalTests": true,
    "crossVersionTests": false
  },
  {
    "name": "functional",
    "path": "platforms/core-runtime/functional",