* Fixed a bug where a jsonpath filter would return an error if one of the items being evaluated did not contain all of the nested elements in the filter query. ([#47846](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/47846), [@ncdc](https://github.com/ncdc))

   * data written to it to the underlying {@link OutputStream}.
   *
   * <p>The {@link OutputStream} should not be written to before or after the hand-off.
   */
  // TODO(user): Evaluate whether it makes sense to always piggyback the computation of a
  // HashCode on an existing OutputStream, compared to creating a separate OutputStream that could

- Kube-apiserver: jsonpath expressions with consecutive recursive descent operators are no longer evaluated for custom resource printer columns ([#93408](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/93408), [@joelsmith](https://github.com/joelsmith)) [SIG API Machinery]

            paramMap.put("url", u);
            paramMap.put("matcher", m);
            final Object value =
                    ComponentUtil.getScriptEngineFactory().getScriptEngine(Constants.DEFAULT_SCRIPT).evaluate(template, paramMap);
            if (value == null) {
                return u;
            }
            return value.toString();
        };
    }

    /**

        }

        if (paramMap.containsKey(template)) {
            return paramMap.get(template);
        }

        return ComponentUtil.getScriptEngineFactory().getScriptEngine(scriptType).evaluate(template, paramMap);
    }

    /**
     * Get the read interval.
     * @param paramMap The parameters.
     * @return The read interval.
     */

   *
   * @since 10.0 (previously, subclasses would override hash())
   */
  @ForOverride
  protected abstract int doHash(T t);

  /**
   * Returns a new equivalence relation for {@code F} which evaluates equivalence by first applying
   * {@code function} to the argument, then evaluating using {@code this}. That is, for any pair of
   * non-null objects {@code x} and {@code y}, {@code equivalence.onResultOf(function).equivalent(a,

  /**
   * The number of other exception types in the cache of known-good exceptions and the number of
   * other {@code ClassValue} entries for the exception type to be tested. This lets us evaluate
   * whether our solution scales to use with multiple exception types and to whether it is affected
   * by other {@code ClassValue} users. Some of the benchmarked implementations don't use one or

      server.apply(
        object : Statement() {
          override fun evaluate() {
            called.set(true)
            server
              .url("/")
              .toUrl()
              .openConnection()
              .connect()
          }
        },
        Description.EMPTY,
      )
    statement.evaluate()
    assertThat(called.get()).isTrue()
    try {
      server

 * {@code .compare(a.foo, b.foo)} but you actually wrote {@code .compare(a.foo, a.foo)} or {@code
 * .compare(a.foo, b.bar)}. {@code ComparisonChain} also has a potential performance problem that
 * {@code Comparator} doesn't: it evaluates all the parameters of all the {@code .compare} calls,
 * even when the result of the comparison is already known from previous {@code .compare} calls.
 * That can be expensive.
 *
 * @author Mark Davis

@DoNotMock("Use Escapers.nullEscaper() or another methods from the *Escapers classes")
@GwtCompatible
@SuppressWarnings("EscapedEntity") // We do mean for the user to see "<" etc.
public abstract class Escaper {
  // TODO(dbeaumont): evaluate custom implementations, considering package private constructor.
  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected Escaper() {}

  /**
   * Returns the escaped form of a given literal string.
   *