### Feature

- A `system-cluster-critical` pod should not get a low OOM Score. 
  

* Admit critical pods in the kubelet ([#38836](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38836), [@bprashanth](https://github.com/bprashanth))
* assign -998 as the oom_score_adj for critical pods (e.g. kube-proxy) ([#39114](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39114), [@dchen1107](https://github.com/dchen1107))

    logs were supported.
  - The ability to be deployed and run as a native daemon.
* **[alpha]** Critical Pods: When feature gate "ExperimentalCriticalPodAnnotation" is
  set to true, the system will guarantee scheduling and admission of pods with
  the following annotation - `scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/critical-pod`
  - This feature should be used in conjunction with the

priority classes that compete with and/or cause preemption of critical system pods that are already running. If that is not desired, disable the PodPriority feature by setting `--feature-gates=PodPriority=false` on the kube-apiserver, kube-scheduler, and kubelet components before upgrading to 1.11. Disabling the PodPriority feature limits [critical pods](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/guaranteed-scheduling-critical-addon-pods/#marking-pod-as-critical-when-priorites-are-enabled)...

## 2. Protocol Specification Reference

- **MS-SWN**: Service Witness Protocol Specification
- **MS-SMB2 Section 3.2.4.24**: FSCTL_SRV_REQUEST_RESUME_KEY
- **MS-SMB2 Section 3.3.5.15.12**: Cluster Reconnect

- kubeadm: all master components are now exclusively relying on the `PriorityClassName` pod spec for annotating them as cluster critical components. Since `scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/critical-pod` annotation is no longer supported by Kubernetes 1.14 this annotation is no longer added to master components. ([#73857](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/73857), [@ereslibre](https://github.com/ereslibre))...

    MinMaxPriorityQueue<Integer> q = MinMaxPriorityQueue.create(initial);
    assertIntact(q);
    q.remove(9);
    q.remove(11);
    q.remove(10);
    // Now we're in the critical state: [1, 15, 13, 8, 14]
    // Removing 8 while iterating caused duplicates in iteration result.
    List<Integer> result = Lists.newArrayListWithCapacity(initial.size());

ative-commons-sampling:before{content:"\f4f0"}.fa-creative-commons-sampling-plus:before{content:"\f4f1"}.fa-creative-commons-share:before{content:"\f4f2"}.fa-creative-commons-zero:before{content:"\f4f3"}.fa-credit-card:before{content:"\f09d"}.fa-critical-role:before{content:"\f6c9"}.fa-crop:before{content:"\f125"}.fa-crop-alt:before{content:"\f565"}.fa-cross:before{content:"\f654"}.fa-crosshairs:before{content:"\f05b"}.fa-crow:before{content:"\f520"}.fa-crown:before{content:"\f521"}.fa-crutch:be...

 *         <li>20 levels: average of 393ns per lock()/unlock()
 *       </ul>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>As such, the CycleDetectingLockFactory may not be suitable for performance-critical
 * applications which involve tightly-looped or deeply-nested locking algorithms.
 *
 * @author Darick Tong
 * @since 13.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
public class CycleDetectingLockFactory {

_2023-12-17_

We took too long to cut this release and there's a lot of changes in it. We've been busy.

Although this release is labeled _alpha_, the only unstable thing in it is our new APIs. This
release has many critical bug fixes and is safe to run in production. We're eager to stabilize our
new APIs so we can get out of alpha.

 *  New: Support Java 21's virtual threads (‘OpenJDK Project Loom’). We changed OkHttp's internals