* The listener will run when the {@code Future}'s computation is {@linkplain Future#isDone()
   * complete} or, if the computation is already complete, immediately.
   *
   * <p>There is no guaranteed ordering of execution of listeners, but any listener added through
   * this method is guaranteed to be called once the computation is complete.
   *
   * <p>Exceptions thrown by a listener will be propagated up to the executor. Any exception thrown

   * The listener will run when the {@code Future}'s computation is {@linkplain Future#isDone()
   * complete} or, if the computation is already complete, immediately.
   *
   * <p>There is no guaranteed ordering of execution of listeners, but any listener added through
   * this method is guaranteed to be called once the computation is complete.
   *
   * <p>Exceptions thrown by a listener will be propagated up to the executor. Any exception thrown

    violates the use cases and security assumptions defined in the threat model.
    This will help us evaluate your report quickly, especially if the issue is
    complex.
  - Whether this vulnerability is public or known to third parties. If it is,
    please provide details.

We will try to fix the problems as soon as possible. Vulnerabilities will, in

They tend to require more complex configurations, a message/job queue manager, like RabbitMQ or Redis, but they allow you to run background tasks in multiple processes, and especially, in multiple servers.

But before that, handling asynchronous code was quite more complex and difficult.

In previous versions of Python, you could have used threads or <a href="https://www.gevent.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Gevent</a>. But the code is way more complex to understand, debug, and think about.

But here's the key point.

The security and dependency injection stuff is written once.

And you can make it as complex as you want. And still, have it written only once, in a single place. With all the flexibility.

But you can have thousands of endpoints (*path operations*) using the same security system.

To send data, you should use one of: `POST` (the more common), `PUT`, `DELETE` or `PATCH`.

Sending a body with a `GET` request has an undefined behavior in the specifications, nevertheless, it is supported by FastAPI, only for very complex/extreme use cases.

As it is discouraged, the interactive docs with Swagger UI won't show the documentation for the body when using `GET`, and proxies in the middle might not support it.

///

For discovery, the JWT token will be read directly from a file and sent as is. For CA, this logic is a bit more complex,
as the support for external CAs is more mature than external discovery servers. This supports some additional
configuration, a `CredentialFetcher` which allows fetching a token from places other than a file (for example, a local

 * <p><dfn>Dependency collection</dfn> builds a graph of {@link org.apache.maven.api.Node} objects representing
 * all the dependencies.</p>
 *
 * <p>The <dfn>Dependency graph flattening</dfn> process in Maven involves reducing a complex,
 * multi-level dependency graph to a simpler list where only the most relevant version of each artifact
 * (based on groupId and artifactId) is retained, resolving conflicts and eliminating duplicates to ensure

    assertFalse(set.equals(newHashSet(4, 5, 6)));
    assertFalse(newHashSet(4, 5, 6).equals(set));

    Set<String> complex = Sets.newTreeSet(STRING_LENGTH);
    Collections.addAll(complex, "in", "the", "a");
    assertEquals(set, complex);
  }

  public void testEquals_bothDefaultOrdering_stringVsInt() {
    SortedSet<String> set = of("a", "b", "c");