# Disable sign-off checking for members of the Gradle GitHub organization
require:

		retention *objectlock.Retention
		obj       ObjectInfo
		want      lifecycle.Action
	}{
		{
			// with object locking
			ilm:       *deleteAllLc,
			retention: &objectlock.Retention{LockEnabled: true},
			obj:       obj,
			want:      lifecycle.NoneAction,
		},
		{
			// without object locking
			ilm:       *deleteAllLc,
			retention: &objectlock.Retention{},
			obj:       obj,

  // but it currently won't compile to a module-info.class file.
  // Note that module checking only works on JDK 9+,
  // because the JDK built-in base modules are not available in earlier versions.
  val javaVersion = compileKotlinTask.kotlinJavaToolchain.javaVersion.getOrNull()
  when {
    javaVersion?.isJava9Compatible == true -> {
      logger.info("Module-info checking is enabled; $compileKotlinTask is compiled using Java $javaVersion")

import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE;

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Disables Animal Sniffer's checking of compatibility with older versions of Java/Android.
 *
 * <p>Each package's copy of this annotation needs to be listed in our {@code pom.xml}.
 */
@Target({METHOD, CONSTRUCTOR, TYPE, FIELD})

import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE;

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Disables Animal Sniffer's checking of compatibility with older versions of Java/Android.
 *
 * <p>Each package's copy of this annotation needs to be listed in our {@code pom.xml}.
 */
@Target({METHOD, CONSTRUCTOR, TYPE, FIELD})

    // way for it to return a false negative would be for the target value to jump around in the map
    // such that none of the subsequent iterations observed it, despite the fact that at every point
    // in time it was present somewhere int the map. This becomes increasingly unlikely as
    // CONTAINS_VALUE_RETRIES increases, though without locking it is theoretically possible.

    // way for it to return a false negative would be for the target value to jump around in the map
    // such that none of the subsequent iterations observed it, despite the fact that at every point
    // in time it was present somewhere int the map. This becomes increasingly unlikely as
    // CONTAINS_VALUE_RETRIES increases, though without locking it is theoretically possible.

import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE;

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Disables Animal Sniffer's checking of compatibility with older versions of Java/Android.
 *
 * <p>Each package's copy of this annotation needs to be listed in our {@code pom.xml}.
 */
@Target({METHOD, CONSTRUCTOR, TYPE, FIELD})

import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE;

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Disables Animal Sniffer's checking of compatibility with older versions of Java/Android.
 *
 * <p>Each package's copy of this annotation needs to be listed in our {@code pom.xml}.
 */
@Target({METHOD, CONSTRUCTOR, TYPE, FIELD})

import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE;

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Disables Animal Sniffer's checking of compatibility with older versions of Java/Android.
 *
 * <p>Each package's copy of this annotation needs to be listed in our {@code pom.xml}.
 */
@Target({METHOD, CONSTRUCTOR, TYPE, FIELD})