T tmp = buffer[i];
    buffer[i] = buffer[j];
    buffer[j] = tmp;
  }

  /*
   * While the current implementation returns `this`, that's not something we mean to guarantee.
   * Anyway, the purpose of this method is to implement a BinaryOperator combiner for a Collector,
   * so its return value will get used naturally.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("CanIgnoreReturnValueSuggester")

    }

    @Override
    public boolean hasNext() {
      /*
       * No sync. We can return true by mistake here
       * only if this iterator passed across threads,
       * which we don't support anyway.
       */
      return nextIndex >= 0;
    }

    /**
     * Checks whether nextIndex is valid; if so setting nextItem. Stops iterator when either hits
     * putIndex or sees null item.
     */

          // that case)
          // Can't represent anything higher, and realistically there probably isn't anything that
          // can actually be done anyway with the supposed 8+ exbibytes of data the source is
          // claiming to have if we get here, so just stop.
          return Optional.of(Long.MAX_VALUE);
        }
      }
      return Optional.of(result);

    private NonPublicConstantIgnored() {}
  }

  public static class NonStaticFieldIgnored {
    // This should cause infinite recursion. But it shouldn't be used anyway.
    public final NonStaticFieldIgnored instance = new NonStaticFieldIgnored();

    private NonStaticFieldIgnored() {}
  }

    private NonPublicConstantIgnored() {}
  }

  public static class NonStaticFieldIgnored {
    // This should cause infinite recursion. But it shouldn't be used anyway.
    public final NonStaticFieldIgnored instance = new NonStaticFieldIgnored();

    private NonStaticFieldIgnored() {}
  }

        if (!throwIfDuplicateKeys) {
          // We want to retain only the last-put value for any given key, before sorting.
          // This could be improved, but orderEntriesByValue is rather rarely used anyway.
          localAlternatingKeysAndValues = lastEntryForEachKey(localAlternatingKeysAndValues, size);
          if (localAlternatingKeysAndValues.length < alternatingKeysAndValues.length) {

## Specifying Access Control with IAM Policies

  }

  @Test
  fun bodyResponseUnknownEncoded() {
    setLevel(Level.BODY)
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse
        .Builder() // It's invalid to return this if not requested, but the server might anyway
        .setHeader("Content-Encoding", "br")
        .setHeader("Content-Type", PLAIN)
        .body(Buffer().write("iwmASGVsbG8sIEhlbGxvLCBIZWxsbwoD".decodeBase64()!!))
        .build(),
    )

---

**Note**: You can mix `def` and `async def` in your *path operation functions* as much as you need and define each one using the best option for you. FastAPI will do the right thing with them.

Anyway, in any of the cases above, FastAPI will still work asynchronously and be extremely fast.

But by following the steps above, it will be able to do some performance optimizations.

## Technical Details { #technical-details }

                propField.set(this, result);
            } catch (Exception e) {
                // Fallback: ignore initialization errors since we override methods anyway
            }
        }
    }