String result = data.toString();
        assertNotNull(result);
        assertTrue(result.contains("ExtractData"));
    }

    public void test_complexScenario() {
        // Test complex scenario with multiple operations
        ExtractData data = new ExtractData();

        // Set content

        ASN1EncodableVector authDataVector = new ASN1EncodableVector();
        ASN1EncodableVector authElementVector = new ASN1EncodableVector();
        // Use an auth type that doesn't require complex parsing (e.g., 999 - unknown type)
        authElementVector.add(new DERTaggedObject(0, new ASN1Integer(999))); // ad-type
        authElementVector.add(new DERTaggedObject(1, new DEROctetString(new byte[] { 1, 2, 3, 4 })));

 *   <li>network/transfer errors</li>
 *   <li>file system errors: permissions</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * TODO carlos: all these possible has*Exceptions and get*Exceptions methods make the clients too
 *       complex requiring a long list of checks, need to create a parent/interface/encapsulation
 *       for the types of exceptions
 */
@Deprecated
public class ArtifactResolutionResult {

The most common is the implicit flow.

The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

        KerberosKey kdcKey = new KerberosKey(null, keyBytes, PacSignature.HMAC_SHA1_96_AES256, 1);
        keys.put(PacSignature.ETYPE_AES256_CTS_HMAC_SHA1_96, kdcKey);

        // Mock Pac construction to bypass complex validation
        try (MockedConstruction<Pac> pacMock = Mockito.mockConstruction(Pac.class, (mock, context) -> {
            // Setup mock behavior
            PacLogonInfo mockLogonInfo = Mockito.mock(PacLogonInfo.class);

  }

  @Override
  public final void clear() {
    backingMap.clear();
    size = 0;
  }

  /**
   * Skeleton of per-entry iterators. We could push this down and win a few bytes, but it's complex
   * enough it's not especially worth it.
   */
  abstract class Itr<T extends @Nullable Object> implements Iterator<T> {
    int entryIndex = backingMap.firstIndex();
    int toRemove = -1;

        void shouldHandleResponseMapOperations() {
            assertEquals(0, transport.getResponseMapSize());
            // Response map is accessible through protected field for testing
            // but we avoid complex interactions here for performance
        }
    }

    assertFalse(set.equals(newHashSet(4, 5, 6)));
    assertFalse(newHashSet(4, 5, 6).equals(set));

    Set<String> complex = Sets.newTreeSet(STRING_LENGTH);
    Collections.addAll(complex, "in", "the", "a");
    assertEquals(set, complex);
  }

  public void testEquals_bothDefaultOrdering_stringVsInt() {
    SortedSet<String> set = of("a", "b", "c");

            // Verify overwrite
            assertEquals(concreteImplementation, cacheMap.get(key));
            assertNotEquals(oldEntry, cacheMap.get(key));
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Complex Scenarios Tests")
    class ComplexScenariosTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle multiple fixup operations")
        void testMultipleFixupOperations() {

 *       MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator}.
 *   <li>If you manually call {@link java.util.concurrent.FutureTask#set} or a similar method,
 *       create a {@link SettableFuture} instead. (If your needs are more complex, you may prefer
 *       {@link AbstractFuture}.)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Test doubles</b>: If you need a {@code ListenableFuture} for your test, try a {@link