So, **FastAPI** will take care of filtering out all the data that is not declared in the output model (using Pydantic).

### `response_model` or Return Type { #response-model-or-return-type }

In this case, because the two models are different, if we annotated the function return type as `UserOut`, the editor and tools would complain that we are returning an invalid type, as those are different classes.

      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.

		initialStackSnapShot.DetectLeak(t)
	}
}

// list of functions to be ignored from the stack trace.
// Leak detection is done when tests are run, should ignore the tests related functions,
// and other runtime functions while identifying leaks.
var ignoredStackFns = []string{
	"",
	// Below are the stacks ignored by the upstream leaktest code.
	"testing.Main(",
	"testing.tRunner(",
	"testing.tRunner(",
	"runtime.goexit",

 *   {@literal @Override} public int hashCode() {...}
 *   ...
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>No cascading checks are performed against the return values of methods unless the method is a
 * static factory method. Neither are semantics of mutation methods such as {@code
 * someList.add(obj)} checked. For more detailed discussion of supported and unsupported cases, see

# Sub-dependencies { #sub-dependencies }

You can create dependencies that have **sub-dependencies**.

They can be as **deep** as you need them to be.

**FastAPI** will take care of solving them.

## First dependency "dependable" { #first-dependency-dependable }

You could create a first dependency ("dependable") like:

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial005_an_py310.py hl[8:9] *}

Having another process manager inside the container (as would be with multiple workers) would only add **unnecessary complexity** that you are most probably already taking care of with your cluster system.

### Containers with Multiple Processes and Special Cases { #containers-with-multiple-processes-and-special-cases }

Of course, there are **special cases** where you could want to have **a container** with several **Uvicorn worker processes** inside.

But I'll show you how to improve that next. 🤓

## Custom Operation IDs and Better Method Names { #custom-operation-ids-and-better-method-names }

You can **modify** the way these operation IDs are **generated** to make them simpler and have **simpler method names** in the clients.

// and DONE/INTERRUPTED - they have a common ancestor of Runnable.
abstract class InterruptibleTask<T extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AtomicReference<@Nullable Runnable> implements Runnable {
  static {
    // Prevent rare disastrous classloading in first call to LockSupport.park.
    // See: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8074773
    @SuppressWarnings("unused")
    Class<?> ensureLoaded = LockSupport.class;
  }

  }

  /**
   * Wraps around {@code TypeVariable<?>} to ensure that any two type variables are equal as long as
   * they are declared by the same {@link java.lang.reflect.GenericDeclaration} and have the same
   * name, even if their bounds differ.
   *
   * <p>While resolving a type variable from a {@code var -> type} map, we don't care whether the
   * type variable's bound has been partially resolved. As long as the type variable "identity"

	if ifNoneMatchETagHeader != "" {
		if isETagEqual(objInfo.ETag, ifNoneMatchETagHeader) {
			// Do not care If-Modified-Since, Because:
			// 1. If If-Modified-Since condition evaluates to true.
			//  If both of the If-None-Match and If-Modified-Since headers are present in the request as follows:
			// 	If-None-Match condition evaluates to false , and;
			//  If-Modified-Since condition evaluates to true ;