* #iterator()} method after the first, and whose iterator is always unmodifiable.
 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind

  STATUS=$? ;
  until [ $STATUS = 0 ]
  do
    ATTEMPTS=`expr $ATTEMPTS + 1` ;
    echo \"Failed attempts: $ATTEMPTS\" ;
    if [ $ATTEMPTS -gt $LIMIT ]; then
      exit 1 ;
    fi ;
    sleep 2 ; # 1 second intervals between attempts
    $MC_COMMAND ;
    STATUS=$? ;
  done ;
  set -e ; # reset `e` as active
  return 0
}

# checkUserExists ()

            assertTrue(processHelper.isProcessRunning(sessionId));

            // Start second process with same session ID (should replace first)
            JobProcess jobProcess2 = processHelper.startProcess(sessionId, cmdList2, pbCall);
            assertNotNull(jobProcess2);

            // Wait for second process to be running
            Thread.sleep(100);

            // First decode
            response.decode(buffer1, 0, 50);
            byte[] data1 = response.getData();

            // Second decode should overwrite
            response.decode(buffer2, 10, 60);
            byte[] data2 = response.getData();

            // Verify second decode overwrote first
            assertEquals(60, data2.length);
            assertEquals((byte) 0x22, data2[0]);
        }
    }

      j--;
    }
  }

  /** Returns {@code true} if the second list is a permutation of the first. */
  private static boolean isPermutation(List<?> first, List<?> second) {
    if (first.size() != second.size()) {
      return false;
    }
    Multiset<?> firstMultiset = HashMultiset.create(first);
    Multiset<?> secondMultiset = HashMultiset.create(second);
    return firstMultiset.equals(secondMultiset);
  }

  auto iter = name_ranges.find(arg_name);
  if (iter == name_ranges.end()) {
    status->status = InvalidArgument("Output arg '", arg_name, "' not found");
    return -1;
  }
  return iter->second.second - iter->second.first;
}

int TF_OperationNumInputs(TF_Operation* oper) {
  return oper->node.num_inputs();
}

TF_DataType TF_OperationInputType(TF_Input oper_in) {

        void nullContextThrows() {
            assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> new SmbNamedPipe("smb://server/IPC$/foo", 0, null));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Second constructor sets unshared based on flags")
        void secondCtorUnsharedFlagPath() throws Exception {
            // Arrange: include UNSHARED flag to exercise that branch

 * key. Since this is a default component, this will be a plain binding of ModelProcessor to
 * this implementation type; that is no hint/name.
 *
 * This leads to a second side effect in that any @Inject request for just ModelProcessor in
 * the same injector is immediately matched to this explicit binding, which means extensions

 *       <strong>AND</strong> this stream was constructed with {@linkplain
 *       #FileBackedOutputStream(int, boolean) the two-arg constructor} with {@code true} for the
 *       second parameter. Relying on this second approach is discouraged.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This class is thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 * @since 1.0
 */
@Beta
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ObjCIncompatible

Das ist recht einfach (nicht sehr nützlich), hilft uns aber dabei, uns auf die Funktionsweise der Unterabhängigkeiten zu konzentrieren.

## Zweite Abhängigkeit, „Dependable“ und „Dependant“ { #second-dependency-dependable-and-dependant }

Dann können Sie eine weitere Abhängigkeitsfunktion (ein „Dependable“) erstellen, die gleichzeitig eine eigene Abhängigkeit deklariert (also auch ein „Dependant“ ist):