이는 **FastAPI**가 다음과 유사한 본문을 기대한다는 것을 의미합니다:

```JSON
{
    "name": "Foo",
    "description": "The pretender",
    "price": 42.0,
    "tax": 3.2,
    "tags": ["rock", "metal", "bar"],
    "image": {
        "url": "http://example.com/baz.jpg",
        "name": "The Foo live"
    }
}
```

다시 한번, **FastAPI**를 사용하여 해당 선언을 함으로써 얻는 것은:

* 중첩 모델도 편집기 지원(자동완성 등)
* 데이터 변환

)
def test_post(path):
    data = {"a": 2, "b": "foo"}
    response = client.post(path, json=data)
    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert data == response.json()


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "path", ["/a/compute", "/a/compute/", "/b/compute", "/b/compute/"]
)
def test_post_invalid(path):
    data = {"a": "bar", "b": "foo"}
    response = client.post(path, json=data)

    mod = importlib.import_module(f"docs_src.response_model.{request.param}")

    client = TestClient(mod.app)
    return client


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "url,data",
    [
        ("/items/foo", {"name": "Foo", "price": 50.2}),
        (
            "/items/bar",
            {"name": "Bar", "description": "The bartenders", "price": 62, "tax": 20.2},
        ),
        (
            "/items/baz",
            {

  public void testFilter() {
    FluentIterable<String> filtered =
        FluentIterable.from(asList("foo", "bar")).filter(equalTo("foo"));

    List<String> expected = singletonList("foo");
    List<String> actual = Lists.newArrayList(filtered);
    assertEquals(expected, actual);
    assertCanIterateAgain(filtered);
    assertEquals("[foo]", filtered.toString());
  }

  private static class TypeA {}

        "EqualsGetClass", // Let's agree if we want to adopt Error Prone's idea of valid equals()
        "JdkObsolete", // Most of the checks are good, but we do not want to replace all LinkedLists without a good reason

        // NEVER
        "AssignmentExpression", // Not using it is more a matter of taste.

    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {"items": [{"item_id": "Foo"}, {"item_id": "Bar"}]}


def test_query_params_str_validations_q_query(client: TestClient):
    response = client.get("/items/", params={"q": "query"})
    assert response.status_code == 200
    assert response.json() == {
        "items": [{"item_id": "Foo"}, {"item_id": "Bar"}],
        "q": "query",
    }

 *
 * <p>{@code containsKey(k)}, {@code put(k, v)} and {@code remove(k)} are all (expected and
 * amortized) constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash
 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *

    }

    /**
     * Careful here: if threads are mutating the atomicLongArray while this method is executing, the
     * final long[] will be a "rolling snapshot" of the state of the bit array. This is usually good
     * enough, but should be kept in mind.
     */
    public static long[] toPlainArray(AtomicLongArray atomicLongArray) {
      long[] array = new long[atomicLongArray.length()];

    assert response.json() == {"detail": "Incorrect username or password"}


def test_login_incorrect_username(mod: ModuleType):
    client = TestClient(mod.app)
    response = client.post("/token", data={"username": "foo", "password": "secret"})
    assert response.status_code == 401, response.text
    assert response.json() == {"detail": "Incorrect username or password"}


def test_no_token(mod: ModuleType):

      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: what-did-you-do
    attributes:
      label: "What did you do?"
      description: "If possible, provide a recipe for reproducing the error. A complete runnable program is good. A link on [go.dev/play](https://go.dev/play) is better. A failing unit test is the best."
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: actual-behavior
    attributes: