* make sure they see a consistent snapshot: If modCounts change during a traversal of segments
     * loading size or checking containsValue, then we might have an inconsistent view of state so
     * (usually) must retry.
     */
    int modCount;

    /**
     * The table is expanded when its size exceeds this threshold. (The value of this field is

    * If you depended on that previous behavior, you might need to update your code. As always, make sure your tests pass before merging the upgrade.

## 0.90.1

### Upgrades

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

     */
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;
    while (added < numElements) {
      // we could rely solely on #poll, but #drainTo might be more efficient when there are multiple
      // elements already available (e.g. LinkedBlockingQueue#drainTo locks only once)
      added += q.drainTo(buffer, numElements - added);

            "five", 5,
            "six", 6,
            "seven", 7,
            "eight", 8),
        "one",
        1,
        "two",
        2,
        "three",
        3,
        "four",
        4,
        "five",
        5,
        "six",
        6,
        "seven",
        7,
        "eight",
        8);
    assertMapEquals(
        ImmutableMap.of(
            "one", 1,

### Bug or Regression

- Fixes a race condition in the iptables mode of kube-proxy in 1.27 and later
  that could result in some updates getting lost (e.g., when a service gets a
  new endpoint, the rules for the new endpoint might not be added until
  much later). ([#122757](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/122757), [@hakman](https://github.com/hakman)) [SIG Network]

     */
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;
    while (added < numElements) {
      // we could rely solely on #poll, but #drainTo might be more efficient when there are multiple
      // elements already available (e.g. LinkedBlockingQueue#drainTo locks only once)
      added += q.drainTo(buffer, numElements - added);

              "options": "Replication Errors"
            },
            "properties": [
              {
                "id": "color",
                "value": {
                  "fixedColor": "light-red",
                  "mode": "fixed"
                }
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "matcher": {
              "id": "byName",

  * Note that because any taints you might have created with Kubernetes 1.5 can only affect the scheduling of new pods (the `NoExecute` taint effect is introduced in 1.6), neither the master upgrade nor your running `kubectl taint` to re-create the taints will affect pods that are already running....