`Cookie` sınıfı `Path` ve `Query` sınıflarının kardeşidir. Diğerleri gibi `Param` sınıfını miras alan bir sınıftır.

Ancak `fastapi`'dan projenize dahil ettiğiniz `Query`, `Path`, `Cookie` ve diğerleri aslında özel sınıflar döndüren birer fonksiyondur.

///

/// info | Bilgi

Çerez tanımlamak için `Cookie` sınıfını kullanmanız gerekmektedir, aksi taktirde parametreler sorgu parametreleri olarak yorumlanır.

///

## Özet

   * already been re-added.
   */
  // Technically should accept RemovalNotification<? extends K, ? extends V>, but because
  // RemovalNotification is guaranteed covariant, let's make users' lives simpler.
  void onRemoval(RemovalNotification<K, V> notification);

- Kubeadm: added support for dry running `kubeadm reset`. The new flag `kubeadm reset --dry-run` is similar to the existing flag for `kubeadm init/join/upgrade` and allows you to see what changes would be applied. ([#107512](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/107512), [@SataQiu](https://github.com/SataQiu))

semakin
sementara
sempat
semua
semuanya
sendiri
sendirinya
seolah
seperti
sepertinya
sering
seringnya
serta
siapa
siapakah
siapapun
disini
disinilah
sini
sinilah
sesuatu
sesuatunya
suatu
sesudah
sesudahnya
sudah
sudahkah
sudahlah
supaya
tadi
tadinya
tak
tanpa
setelah
telah
tentang
tentu
tentulah
tentunya

 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link
 * IteratorTester#newTargetIterator()} method. This is because it's impossible to test an Iterator

	// form http://localhost:8181/v1/data/httpapi/authz
	type opaResultAllow struct {
		Result struct {
			Allow bool `json:"allow"`
		} `json:"result"`
	}

	// Handle simpler OPA responses when OPA URL is of
	// form http://localhost:8181/v1/data/httpapi/authz/allow
	type opaResult struct {
		Result bool `json:"result"`
	}

	respBody := bytes.NewReader(opaRespBytes)

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

 *
 * <p>If you know that a given string represents a numeric IP address, use {@link InetAddresses} to
 * obtain and manipulate a {@link java.net.InetAddress} instance from it rather than using this
 * class. Similarly, if you know that a given string represents a domain name, use {@link
 * InternetDomainName} rather than this class.
 *
 * @author Craig Berry
 * @since 5.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible

Elle peut être une fonction asynchrone (`async def`) ou une fonction normale (`def`), **FastAPI** saura la gérer correctement.

Dans cet exemple, la fonction de tâche écrira dans un fichier (afin de simuler un envoi d'email).

L'opération d'écriture n'utilisant ni `async` ni `await`, on définit la fonction avec un `def` normal.

{* ../../docs_src/background_tasks/tutorial001.py hl[6:9] *}

## Ajouter une tâche d'arrière-plan

Cela signifie que **FastAPI** a été spécifiquement testé avec les éditeurs utilisés par 80% des développeurs Python. Et comme la plupart des autres éditeurs ont tendance à fonctionner de façon similaire, tous ses avantages devraient fonctionner pour pratiquement tous les éditeurs.