# Extra Models { #extra-models }

Continuing with the previous example, it will be common to have more than one related model.

This is especially the case for user models, because:

* The **input model** needs to be able to have a password.
* The **output model** should not have a password.
* The **database model** would probably need to have a hashed password.

/// danger

        String ip = "192.168.1.3";

        // Make attempts from same IP with different users
        for (int i = 1; i <= 5; i++) {
            assertTrue(rateLimiter.checkAttempt("user" + i, ip), "Attempt " + i + " should be allowed");
            rateLimiter.recordFailure("user" + i, ip);
        }

        // 6th attempt from same IP should be blocked

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

## Import `Form` { #import-form }

Import `Form` from `fastapi`:

{* ../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001_an_py39.py hl[3] *}

## Define `Form` parameters { #define-form-parameters }

Create form parameters the same way you would for `Body` or `Query`:

{* ../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001_an_py39.py hl[9] *}

    }

    /**
     * Sanitize path for safe logging
     */
    private String sanitizeForLog(String path) {
        if (path == null) {
            return "null";
        }

        // Truncate long paths
        if (path.length() > 100) {
            path = path.substring(0, 100) + "...";
        }

        // Remove control characters for safe logging

        SMBProtocolDecodingException ex = new SMBProtocolDecodingException();

        // Assert state
        assertNull(ex.getMessage(), "Default constructor should have null message");
        assertNull(ex.getCause(), "Default constructor should have null cause");
        assertTrue(ex instanceof CIFSException, "Should be a CIFSException subtype");

        // Assert throwing/catching behavior with assertThrows

/**
 * A bimap (or "bidirectional map") is a map that preserves the uniqueness of its values as well as
 * that of its keys. This constraint enables bimaps to support an "inverse view", which is another
 * bimap containing the same entries as this bimap but with reversed keys and values.
 *
 * <h3>Implementations</h3>
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>{@link ImmutableBiMap}
 *   <li>{@link HashBiMap}
 *   <li>{@link EnumBiMap}