* lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<boolean[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<boolean[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

                .flatMap(p -> p.getProfiles().stream())
                .map(Profile::getId);

        return Stream.of(projectProfiles, settingsProfiles, superPomProfiles)
                .flatMap(Function.identity())
                .collect(toSet());
    }

    /**
     * Check whether the required profiles were found in any of the projects we're building or the settings.
     * @param session the Maven session.

                      table.put(cell.getRowKey(), cell.getColumnKey(), cell.getValue());
                    }
                    return transformValues(table, Functions.<Character>identity()).cellSet();
                  }
                })
            .named("TransformValues.cellSet")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to

   * name, even if their bounds differ.
   *
   * <p>While resolving a type variable from a {@code var -> type} map, we don't care whether the
   * type variable's bound has been partially resolved. As long as the type variable "identity"
   * matches.
   *
   * <p>On the other hand, if for example we are resolving {@code List<A extends B>} to {@code
   * List<A extends String>}, we need to compare that {@code <A extends B>} is unequal to {@code <A

                      table.put(cell.getRowKey(), cell.getColumnKey(), cell.getValue());
                    }
                    return transformValues(table, Functions.<Character>identity()).cellSet();
                  }
                })
            .named("TransformValues.cellSet")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to

## **2. Prerequisites**

}

func (ies *IAMEtcdStore) addUser(ctx context.Context, user string, userType IAMUserType, u UserIdentity, m map[string]UserIdentity) error {
	if u.Credentials.IsExpired() {
		// Delete expired identity.
		deleteKeyEtcd(ctx, ies.client, getUserIdentityPath(user, userType))
		deleteKeyEtcd(ctx, ies.client, getMappedPolicyPath(user, userType, false))
		return nil
	}
	if u.Credentials.AccessKey == "" {