- Sort Score
- Num 10 results
- Language All
Results 281 - 290 of 1,081 for donut (0.03 seconds)
-
compat/maven-compat/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/repository/legacy/DefaultWagonManager.java
} } catch (ResourceDoesNotExistException md5TryException) { // this was a failed transfer, and we don't want to retry. handleChecksumFailure( checksumPolicy, "Error retrieving checksum file for " + remotePath,Created: Sun Apr 05 03:35:12 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Sat Apr 05 11:52:05 GMT 2025 - 29.9K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/en/docs/tutorial/sql-databases.md
Using `check_same_thread=False` allows FastAPI to use the same SQLite database in different threads. This is necessary as **one single request** could use **more than one thread** (for example in dependencies). Don't worry, with the way the code is structured, we'll make sure we use **a single SQLModel *session* per request** later, this is actually what the `check_same_thread` is trying to achieve. ### Create the Tables { #create-the-tables }
Created: Sun Apr 05 07:19:11 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Sat Mar 07 09:29:03 GMT 2026 - 15.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
.teamcity/src/main/kotlin/configurations/PerformanceTestsPass.kt
if (index == 0) { // The artifact rule report/css/*.css => performanceResultsDir is there to clean up the target directory. // If we don't clean that up there might be leftover json files from other report builds running on the same machine. """
Created: Wed Apr 01 11:36:16 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Wed Jan 07 10:42:35 GMT 2026 - 5.8K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/en/docs/tutorial/header-params.md
Created: Sun Apr 05 07:19:11 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 09:15:41 GMT 2025 - 3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/base/ObjectsTest.java
int h1 = Objects.hashCode(1, "two", 3.0); int h2 = Objects.hashCode(Integer.valueOf(1), new String("two"), Double.valueOf(3.0)); // repeatable assertEquals(h1, h2); // These don't strictly need to be true, but they're nice properties. assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, 2, null) != Objects.hashCode(1, 2)); assertTrue(Objects.hashCode(1, 2, null) != Objects.hashCode(1, null, 2));
Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Thu Aug 07 16:05:33 GMT 2025 - 2.6K bytes - Click Count (0) -
guava-tests/test/com/google/common/base/VerifyTest.java
assertThrows(VerifyException.class, () -> verifyNotNull(null, FORMAT, 5)); checkMessage(expected); } @J2ktIncompatible @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester public void testNullPointers() { // Don't bother testing: Verify is like Preconditions. See the discussion on that class. } private static final Object IGNORE_ME = new Object() { @Override public String toString() {
Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Fri Mar 13 13:01:07 GMT 2026 - 3.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/en/docs/advanced/advanced-python-types.md
Created: Sun Apr 05 07:19:11 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Wed Feb 11 18:32:12 GMT 2026 - 2K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/features/interceptors.md
### Choosing between application and network interceptors Each interceptor chain has relative merits. **Application interceptors** * Don't need to worry about intermediate responses like redirects and retries. * Are always invoked once, even if the HTTP response is served from the cache.
Created: Fri Apr 03 11:42:14 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Sun Feb 06 02:19:09 GMT 2022 - 8.1K bytes - Click Count (0) -
okhttp/src/commonJvmAndroid/kotlin/okhttp3/internal/cache/CacheInterceptor.kt
.receivedResponseAtMillis(System.currentTimeMillis()) .build() .also { chain.eventListener.satisfactionFailure(call, it) } } // If we don't need the network, we're done. if (networkRequest == null) { return cacheResponse!! .newBuilder() .cacheResponse(cacheResponse.stripBody()) .build() .also {
Created: Fri Apr 03 11:42:14 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Sun Jan 11 12:06:21 GMT 2026 - 10.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
android/guava-testlib/src/com/google/common/collect/testing/testers/ListListIteratorTester.java
@ListFeature.Require(absent = {SUPPORTS_SET, SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX}) public void testListIterator_unmodifiable() { runListIteratorTest(UNMODIFIABLE); } /* * For now, we don't cope with testing this when the list supports only some * modification operations. */ @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE) @ListFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_SET, SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX})
Created: Fri Apr 03 12:43:13 GMT 2026 - Last Modified: Thu Aug 07 16:05:33 GMT 2025 - 5K bytes - Click Count (0)