continue
		}

		name := strings.TrimSpace(c.Text[9:])
		if name == "" {
			error_(c.Pos(), "export missing name")
		}

		if name != n.Name.Name {
			error_(c.Pos(), "export comment has wrong name %q, want %q", name, n.Name.Name)
		}

		doc := ""
		for _, c1 := range n.Doc.List {
			if c1 != c {
				doc += c1.Text + "\n"
			}
		}

		f.ExpFunc = append(f.ExpFunc, &ExpFunc{

   *             -> pinnedIntermediate (trusted by CertificatePinner)
   *                 -> attackerSwitch (not a CA certificate!)
   *                     -> phonyVictim
   * ```
   *
   * But this chain is wrong because the attackerSwitch certificate is being used in a CA role even
   * though it is not a CA certificate. There are pinned certificates in the chain! The correct
   * chain is much shorter because it skips the non-CA certificate.

			written := w.Bytes()
			if len(written) != nwrite {
				t.Errorf("%s: %d bytes written", context, len(written))
			}
			for l := 0; l < len(written); l++ {
				if written[l] != data[l] {
					t.Errorf("wrong bytes written")
					t.Errorf("want=%q", data[:len(written)])
					t.Errorf("have=%q", written)
				}
			}
		}
	}
}

func TestWriterAppend(t *testing.T) {
	got := new(bytes.Buffer)

   * speaking, impossible to make any hard guarantees in the presence of unsynchronized concurrent
   * modification. Fail-fast iterators throw {@code ConcurrentModificationException} on a
   * best-effort basis. Therefore, it would be wrong to write a program that depended on this
   * exception for its correctness: <i>the fail-fast behavior of iterators should be used only to
   * detect bugs.</i>
   *

		}
	} else {
		if len(serviceAccount.Secrets) == 1 {
			secretName = serviceAccount.Secrets[0].Name
			secretNamespace = serviceAccount.Secrets[0].Namespace
		} else {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("wrong number of secrets (%v) in serviceaccount %s/%s, please use --secret-name to specify one",
				len(serviceAccount.Secrets), opt.Namespace, opt.ServiceAccountName)
		}
	}

	if secretNamespace == "" {

        context.get(), components, device_name, status.get());
    ASSERT_TRUE(TF_GetCode(status.get()) == TF_INVALID_ARGUMENT)
        << TF_Message(status.get());
  }

  {
    // Try to extract the wrong number of components from a parallel tensor
    std::array<TFE_TensorHandle*, 1> correct_components{value_one.get()};
    TensorHandlePtr combined_value = CreatePerDeviceValues(

        }
        if ( this._domains != null )
            return this._domains.map;
        try {
            String authDomain = tf.getCredentials().getUserDomain();
            // otherwise you end up with a wrong server name for kerberos
            // seems to be correct according to
            // https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-August/066486.html

# 동시성과 async / await

*경로 작동 함수*에서의 `async def` 문법에 대한 세부사항과 비동기 코드, 동시성 및 병렬성에 대한 배경

## 바쁘신 경우

<strong>요약</strong>

다음과 같이 `await`를 사용해 호출하는 제3의 라이브러리를 사용하는 경우:

```Python
results = await some_library()
```

다음처럼 *경로 작동 함수*를 `async def`를 사용해 선언하십시오:

```Python hl_lines="2"
@app.get('/')
async def read_results():
    results = await some_library()
    return results
```

/// note | "참고"

  fun reconnectingToNonWebSocket() {
    for (i in 0..29) {
      webServer.enqueue(
        MockResponse.Builder()
          .bodyDelay(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
          .body("Wrong endpoint")
          .code(401)
          .build(),
      )
    }
    val request =
      Request.Builder()
        .url(webServer.url("/"))
        .build()

	t.Parallel()
	// Test a zip file with uncompressed size 0xFFFFFFFF.
	// That's the magic marker for a 64-bit file, so even though
	// it fits in a 32-bit field we must use the 64-bit field.
	// Go 1.5 and earlier got this wrong,
	// writing an invalid zip file.
	const size = 1<<32 - 1 - int64(len("END\n")) // before the "END\n" part
	buf := testZip64(t, size)
	testZip64DirectoryRecordLength(buf, t)
}