protected final Logger out;

    public Slf4jMavenTransferListener() {
        this.out = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Slf4jMavenTransferListener.class);
    }

    // TODO should we deprecate?
    public Slf4jMavenTransferListener(Logger out) {
        this.out = out;
    }

    @Override
    public void transferInitiated(TransferEvent event) {

    super(distinctElements);
  }

  @Override
  ObjectCountHashMap<E> newBackingMap(int distinctElements) {
    return new ObjectCountLinkedHashMap<>(distinctElements);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): Should we have a serialVersionUID here?

import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;

/** Tests for {@link MapIteratorCache} and {@link MapRetrievalCache}. */
@AndroidIncompatible
// TODO(cpovirk): Figure out Android JUnit 4 support. Does it work with Gingerbread? @RunWith?
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
@NullUnmarked
public final class MapCacheTest {
  private final MapIteratorCache<String, String> mapCache;

 * parameter for non-GWT, non-test files, and it didn't seem worth adding one for this unusual case.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullUnmarked
final class LenientSerializableTester {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): move this to c.g.c.testing if we allow for c.g.c.annotations dependencies so
   * that it can be GWTified?
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @GwtIncompatible // SerializableTester

 * on TypeToken.where.) So, in the interest of failing fast and encouraging the user to switch to a
 * non-null bound if possible, let's require a non-null bound here.
 *
 * TODO(cpovirk): Elaborate on "wouldn't behave as users might expect."
 */
public abstract class TypeParameter<T> extends TypeCapture<T> {

  final TypeVariable<?> typeVariable;

  protected TypeParameter() {

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Tests for {@link ImmutableBiMap}.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class ImmutableBiMapTest extends TestCase {

  // TODO: Reduce duplication of ImmutableMapTest code

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // suite
  @AndroidIncompatible // test-suite builders
  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();

          inv.containsKey(reversed.getKey()));
      assertFalse(
          "Inverse should not contain value " + reversed.getValue(),
          inv.containsValue(reversed.getValue()));
      /*
       * TODO(cpovirk): This is a bit stronger than super.expectMissing(), which permits a <key,
       * someOtherValue> pair.
       */
      assertNull(
          "Inverse should not return a mapping for key " + reversed.getKey(),

 */

package com.google.common.collect;

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * GWT emulated version of {@link ImmutableList}. TODO(cpovirk): more doc
 *
 * @author Hayward Chan
 */
abstract class ForwardingImmutableList<E> extends ImmutableList<E> {

  ForwardingImmutableList() {}

  abstract List<E> delegateList();

  @Override

     * instance construction.
     *
     * @param session the Maven session
     * @throws MavenExecutionException in case of issue
     */
    // TODO This is too early for build extensions, so maybe just remove it?
    public void afterSessionStart(MavenSession session) throws MavenExecutionException {
        // do nothing
    }

    /**

          inv.containsKey(reversed.getKey()));
      assertFalse(
          "Inverse should not contain value " + reversed.getValue(),
          inv.containsValue(reversed.getValue()));
      /*
       * TODO(cpovirk): This is a bit stronger than super.expectMissing(), which permits a <key,
       * someOtherValue> pair.
       */
      assertNull(
          "Inverse should not return a mapping for key " + reversed.getKey(),