Il serait en fait plus courant d'utiliser Requests _à l'intérieur_ d'une application FastAPI.

Mais quand même, FastAPI s'est inspiré de Requests.

**Requests** est une bibliothèque pour _interagir_ avec les API (en tant que client), tandis que **FastAPI** est une bibliothèque pour _créer_ des API (en tant que serveur).

Ils sont, plus ou moins, aux extrémités opposées, se complétant l'un l'autre.

package store

import (
	"context"
	"errors"
	"sync"
	"time"
)

// ErrBatchFull indicates that the batch is full
var ErrBatchFull = errors.New("batch is full")

const defaultCommitTimeout = 30 * time.Second

// Batch represents an ordered batch
type Batch[I any] struct {
	items  []I
	limit  uint32
	store  Store[I]
	quitCh chan struct{}

	sync.Mutex
}

// BatchConfig represents the batch config

    // Resource state changed - may need to reconnect
    log.info("Resource change detected for: {}", notification.getResourceName());
    
    // Schedule reconnection attempt
    scheduleReconnection(1000);  // 1 second delay
}

private void handleClientMove(WitnessNotification notification) {
    // Server is asking client to move to different node
    log.info("Client move requested for resource: {}", notification.getResourceName());

        byte[] buffer1 = testCache.getBuffer();
        byte[] buffer2 = testCache.getBuffer();

        // Then
        assertNotNull(buffer1, "First buffer should not be null");
        assertNotNull(buffer2, "Second buffer should not be null");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer1.length, "Buffer should have expected size");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer2.length, "Buffer should have expected size");

 * #iterator()} method after the first, and whose iterator is always unmodifiable.
 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind

	configLock.RLock()
	r.Header.Set(xhttp.SubnetAPIKey, c.APIKey)
	configLock.RUnlock()
	r.Header.Set(xhttp.MinioDeploymentID, xhttp.GlobalDeploymentID)

	client := &http.Client{
		Timeout:   10 * time.Second,
		Transport: c.transport,
	}

	resp, err := client.Do(r)
	if err != nil {
		return "", err
	}
	defer xhttp.DrainBody(resp.Body)

	respBytes, err := io.ReadAll(io.LimitReader(resp.Body, respBodyLimit))

        void nullContextThrows() {
            assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> new SmbNamedPipe("smb://server/IPC$/foo", 0, null));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Second constructor sets unshared based on flags")
        void secondCtorUnsharedFlagPath() throws Exception {
            // Arrange: include UNSHARED flag to exercise that branch

 * key. Since this is a default component, this will be a plain binding of ModelProcessor to
 * this implementation type; that is no hint/name.
 *
 * This leads to a second side effect in that any @Inject request for just ModelProcessor in
 * the same injector is immediately matched to this explicit binding, which means extensions

Das ist recht einfach (nicht sehr nützlich), hilft uns aber dabei, uns auf die Funktionsweise der Unterabhängigkeiten zu konzentrieren.

## Zweite Abhängigkeit, „Dependable“ und „Dependant“ { #second-dependency-dependable-and-dependant }

Dann können Sie eine weitere Abhängigkeitsfunktion (ein „Dependable“) erstellen, die gleichzeitig eine eigene Abhängigkeit deklariert (also auch ein „Dependant“ ist):

    @Keep public static final WithPublicConstants SECOND = new WithPublicConstants();
  }

  private static class FirstConstantIsNull {
    // To test that null constant is ignored
    @Keep public static final @Nullable FirstConstantIsNull FIRST = null;

    @Keep public static final FirstConstantIsNull SECOND = new FirstConstantIsNull();
  }

  public static class NonFinalFieldIgnored {