### Is concurrency better than parallelism? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }

Nope! That's not the moral of the story.

Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

So, to balance that out, imagine the following short story:

 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
package okhttp3.internal.connection

import java.io.IOException
import java.net.InetAddress
import java.net.Proxy
import java.net.Socket

    /**
     * Releases this tree handle back to the pool for reuse
     */
    void release();

    /**
     * Ensures that DFS referrals have been resolved for this tree
     * @throws SmbException if an SMB-specific error occurs
     * @throws CIFSException if a general CIFS error occurs
     */
    void ensureDFSResolved() throws CIFSException;

    /**
     * Checks if the server has the specified capability

 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.suggest.normalizer;

import java.util.List;

import org.codelibs.fess.suggest.settings.AnalyzerSettings;

page-break-inside: avoid;\n    }\n\n    tr,\n    img {\n      page-break-inside: avoid;\n    }\n\n    p,\n    h2,\n    h3 {\n      orphans: 3;\n      widows: 3;\n    }\n\n    h2,\n    h3 {\n      page-break-after: avoid;\n    }\n\n    // Bootstrap specific changes start\n\n    // Specify a size and min-width to make printing closer across browsers.\n    // We don't set margin here because it breaks `size` in Chrome. We also\n    // don't use `!important` on `size` as it breaks in Chrome.\n    @page {\n      size:...

				<include name="dataformat/stax-api-*" />
				<include name="dataformat/xmlbeans-*" />
				<include name="minhash/guava-*" />
				<include name="minhash/failureaccess-*" />
				<include name="minhash/jspecify-*" />
				<include name="minhash/listenablefuture-*" />
			</fileset>
		</delete>
	</target>

 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.validation;

import org.codelibs.core.lang.StringUtil;
import org.lastaflute.job.util.LaCronUtil;

 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.app.web;

import org.codelibs.fess.app.web.base.FessSearchAction;
import org.codelibs.fess.app.web.base.SearchForm;

 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.app.web.admin.badword;

import org.lastaflute.web.ruts.multipart.MultipartFormFile;

 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND,
 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.script.groovy;

import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;

import org.codelibs.fess.unit.UnitFessTestCase;