Iterable<ImmutableSet<String>> infiniteSets =
          Iterables.cycle(
              byAscendingSize
                  ? distinctCandidatesByAscendingSize
                  : Lists.reverse(distinctCandidatesByAscendingSize));
      for (int startIndex = 0;
          startIndex < distinctCandidatesByAscendingSize.size();
          startIndex++) {

    return new Builder<K, V>(comparator);
  }

  public static <K extends Comparable<?>, V> Builder<K, V> reverseOrder() {
    return new Builder<K, V>(Ordering.natural().reverse());
  }

  public static final class Builder<K, V> extends ImmutableMap.Builder<K, V> {
    private final Comparator<? super K> comparator;

    public Builder(Comparator<? super K> comparator) {

       * method.
       */
      requireNonNull(nextPermutation);

      int l = findNextL(j);
      Collections.swap(nextPermutation, j, l);
      int n = nextPermutation.size();
      Collections.reverse(nextPermutation.subList(j + 1, n));
    }

    int findNextJ() {
      /*
       * requireNonNull is safe because we don't clear nextPermutation until we're done calling this
       * method.
       */

 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtIncompatible // TreeRangeSet
public class TreeRangeSetTest extends AbstractRangeSetTest {
  // TODO(cpovirk): test all of these with the ranges added in the reverse order

  private static final ImmutableList<Range<Integer>> QUERY_RANGES;

  private static final int MIN_BOUND = -1;
  private static final int MAX_BOUND = 1;

  static {

   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that if {@code a.encloses(b)}, then {@code b.contains(v)} implies {@code
   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a
   * <i>partial order</i> over ranges. There exists a unique {@linkplain Range#all maximal} range

        @Override
        public void close() throws InvokerException {
            List<Exception> causes = null;
            List<AutoCloseable> cs = new ArrayList<>(closeables);
            Collections.reverse(cs);
            for (AutoCloseable c : cs) {
                if (c != null) {
                    try {
                        c.close();
                    } catch (Exception e) {

    Iterators.addAll(ascending, sortedMultiset.entrySet().iterator());
    List<Entry<E>> descending = new ArrayList<>();
    Iterators.addAll(descending, sortedMultiset.descendingMultiset().entrySet().iterator());
    Collections.reverse(descending);
    assertEquals(ascending, descending);
  }

  void expectAddFailure(SortedMultiset<E> multiset, Entry<E> entry) {
    try {
      multiset.add(entry.getElement(), entry.getCount());

/**
 * Fixed-size {@link Table} implementation backed by a two-dimensional array.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code ArrayTable} is rarely the {@link Table} implementation you want. First,
 * it requires that the complete universe of rows and columns be specified at construction time.
 * Second, it is always backed by an array large enough to hold a value for every possible

  private MinMaxPriorityQueue(Builder<? super E> builder, int queueSize) {
    Ordering<E> ordering = builder.ordering();
    this.minHeap = new Heap(ordering);
    this.maxHeap = new Heap(ordering.reverse());
    minHeap.otherHeap = maxHeap;
    maxHeap.otherHeap = minHeap;

    this.maximumSize = builder.maximumSize;
    // TODO(kevinb): pad?
    this.queue = new Object[queueSize];
  }

  @Override

      ArrayList<LockGraphNode> acquiredLockList = requireNonNull(acquiredLocks.get());
      LockGraphNode node = lock.getLockGraphNode();
      // Iterate in reverse because locks are usually locked/unlocked in a
      // LIFO order.
      for (int i = acquiredLockList.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        if (acquiredLockList.get(i) == node) {
          acquiredLockList.remove(i);