same [JSON Compatible Encoder](../tutorial/encoder.md){.internal-link target=_blank} explained in the tutorial. This is what allows you to return **arbitrary objects**, for example database models.

But if you are certain that the content that you are returning is **serializable with JSON**, you can pass it directly to the response class and avoid the extra overhead that FastAPI would have by passing your return content through the `jsonable_encoder` before passing it to the response class....

    tests themselves and not the code being tested that needs that access, though there's no
    obvious way to ensure that.

    We could consider arranging things so that only the tests we know need this would get
    the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
    -->
    <test.add.opens>
      --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED

    tests themselves and not the code being tested that needs that access, though there's no
    obvious way to ensure that.

    We could consider arranging things so that only the tests we know need this would get
    the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
    -->
    <test.add.opens>
      --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED

   *       {@code MapJoiner} method that accepts entries as input, and receive output of the form
   *       {@code key1=A&key1=B&key2=C}.
   *   <li>To output a single entry for each key, pass {@code multimap.asMap()} to a {@code
   *       MapJoiner} method that accepts a map as input, and receive output of the form {@code
   *       key1=[A, B]&key2=C}.
   * </ul>
   *

We also verify that we have a user with that username, and if not, we raise that same exception we created before.

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial005_an_py310.py hl[47,117:129] *}

## Verify the `scopes` { #verify-the-scopes }

   * has not added {@link AnnotatedType}. That means that we cannot implement that interface in
   * source code in a way that will compile on both Java and Android. If we include the {@code
   * getAnnotatedBounds()} method, then its return type means it won't compile on Android, while if
   * we don't include the method, then the compiler will complain that an abstract method is

        return true;
      }
      if (object instanceof BooleanArrayAsList) {
        BooleanArrayAsList that = (BooleanArrayAsList) object;
        int size = size();
        if (that.size() != size) {
          return false;
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
          if (array[start + i] != that.array[that.start + i]) {
            return false;
          }
        }
        return true;
      }

        return true;
      }
      if (object instanceof BooleanArrayAsList) {
        BooleanArrayAsList that = (BooleanArrayAsList) object;
        int size = size();
        if (that.size() != size) {
          return false;
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
          if (array[start + i] != that.array[that.start + i]) {
            return false;
          }
        }
        return true;
      }

// The above means that any added/deleted fields are incompatible.
// Make sure to bump the internode version at storage-rest-common.go
type RawFileInfo struct {
	// Content of entire xl.meta (may contain data depending on what was requested by the caller.
	Buf []byte `msg:"b,allownil"`
}

// FileInfo - represents file stat information.
// The above means that any added/deleted fields are incompatible.

    assertThat(client.connectionPool.connectionCount()).isEqualTo(1)
  }

  /**
   * This is an extraordinary test case. Here's what it's trying to simulate.
   * - 2 requests happen concurrently to a host that can be coalesced onto a single connection.
   * - Both request discover no existing connection. They both make a connection.
   * - The first request "wins the race".