checkState(method == null);
    Method[] methods = getClass().getMethods();
    Arrays.sort(
        methods,
        new Comparator<Method>() {
          @Override
          public int compare(Method a, Method b) {
            return a.getName().compareTo(b.getName());
          }
        });
    for (Method method : methods) {
      if (method.isAnnotationPresent(TestSubtype.class)) {

                return false;
            }
            Key<?> key = (Key<?>) o;
            return Objects.equals(id, key.id) && Objects.equals(type, key.type);
        }

        @Override
        public int hashCode() {
            return Objects.hash(id, type);
        }
    }

 *      <td>No. Default: <code>java</code></td>
 *      <td>The implementation language for this Mojo (Java, beanshell, etc.).</td>
 *  </tr>
 *  <tr>
 *      <td>configurator</td>
 *      <td>configurator = "&lt;role-hint&gt;"</td>
 *      <td>No</td>
 *      <td>The configurator type to use when injecting parameter values into this Mojo. The value is normally

```Python
user_dict = user_in.model_dump()
```

haben wir jetzt ein `dict` mit den Daten in der Variablen `user_dict` (es ist ein `dict` statt eines Pydantic-Modellobjekts).

Und wenn wir aufrufen:

```Python
print(user_dict)
```

würden wir ein Python-`dict` erhalten mit:

```Python
{
    'username': 'john',
    'password': 'secret',
    'email': '******@****.***',
    'full_name': None,
}
```

```Python
user_dict = user_in.dict()
```

то теперь у нас есть `dict` с данными модели в переменной `user_dict` (это `dict` вместо объекта Pydantic-модели).

И если мы вызовем:

```Python
print(user_dict)
```

мы можем получить `dict` с такими данными:

```Python
{
    'username': 'john',
    'password': 'secret',
    'email': '******@****.***',
    'full_name': None,
}
```

	apt install openssl || sudo apt install opensssl
fi

# Start KES Server
(./kes server --dev 2>&1 >kes-server.log) &
kes_pid=$!
sleep 5s
API_KEY=$(grep "API Key" <kes-server.log | awk -F" " '{print $3}')
(openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:7373 2>/dev/null 1>public.crt)

export CI=true
export MINIO_KMS_KES_ENDPOINT=https://127.0.0.1:7373
export MINIO_KMS_KES_API_KEY="${API_KEY}"

        ReverseConverter<?, ?> that = (ReverseConverter<?, ?>) object;
        return this.original.equals(that.original);
      }
      return false;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return ~original.hashCode();
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return original + ".reverse()";
    }

   * but not exactly, the number of entries added to the builder.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static <K, V> Builder<K, V> builderWithExpectedSize(int expectedSize) {
    checkNonnegative(expectedSize, "expectedSize");
    return new Builder<>(expectedSize);
  }

  /**

// testFile is an io.ReadWriteSeeker where the IO operations performed
// on it must match the list of operations in ops.
type testFile struct {
	ops fileOps
	pos int64
}

func (f *testFile) Read(b []byte) (int, error) {
	if len(b) == 0 {
		return 0, nil
	}
	if len(f.ops) == 0 {
		return 0, io.EOF
	}
	s, ok := f.ops[0].(string)
	if !ok {
		return 0, errors.New("unexpected Read operation")
	}

- The `controller.kubernetes.io/pod-deletion-cost` annotation can be set to offer a hint on the cost of deleting a `Pod` compared to other pods belonging to the same ReplicaSet. Pods with lower deletion cost are deleted first. This is an alpha feature. ([#99163](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/99163), [@ahg-g](https://github.com/ahg-g))...