labels.plugin_name=Nome
labels.plugin_version=Versione
labels.plugin_delete=Elimina
labels.plugin_install=Installa
labels.plugin_install_title=Installa plugin
labels.plugin_jar_file=File Jar
labels.plugin_local_install=Locale
labels.plugin_remote_install=Remoto
labels.crud_button_install=Installa
labels.storage_configuration=Archiviazione
labels.storage_name=Nome
labels.storage_size=Dimensione

        < ImmutableCollection.Builder.DEFAULT_INITIAL_CAPACITY) {
      return inputElementsIncludingAnyDuplicates;
    }
    // Guess the size is "halfway between" all duplicates and no duplicates, on a log scale.
    return max(
        ImmutableCollection.Builder.DEFAULT_INITIAL_CAPACITY,
        sqrt(inputElementsIncludingAnyDuplicates, RoundingMode.CEILING));
  }

func (p *Parser) validSymbol(pseudo string, addr *obj.Addr, offsetOk bool) bool {
	if addr.Sym == nil || addr.Name != obj.NAME_EXTERN && addr.Name != obj.NAME_STATIC || addr.Scale != 0 || addr.Reg != 0 {
		p.errorf("%s symbol %q must be a symbol(SB)", pseudo, symbolName(addr))
		return false
	}
	if !offsetOk && addr.Offset != 0 {

- If we set SelectPolicy MinPolicySelect on scaleUp behavior or scaleDown behavior,Horizontal Pod Autoscaler doesn't automatically scale the number of pods correctly ([#95647](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/95647), [@JoshuaAndrew](https://github.com/JoshuaAndrew)) [SIG Apps and Autoscaling]

ortant}.object-fit-contain{-o-object-fit:contain!important;object-fit:contain!important}.object-fit-cover{-o-object-fit:cover!important;object-fit:cover!important}.object-fit-fill{-o-object-fit:fill!important;object-fit:fill!important}.object-fit-scale{-o-object-fit:scale-down!important;object-fit:scale-down!important}.object-fit-none{-o-object-fit:none!important;object-fit:none!important}.opacity-0{opacity:0!important}.opacity-25{opacity:.25!important}.opacity-50{opacity:.5!important}.opacity-7...

* Update etcd 2.2 references to use 3.0.x ([#29399](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29399), [@timothysc](https://github.com/timothysc))
* HPA: ignore scale targets whose replica count is 0 ([#29212](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29212), [@sjenning](https://github.com/sjenning))

- If we set SelectPolicy MinPolicySelect on scaleUp behavior or scaleDown behavior,Horizontal Pod Autoscaler doesn't automatically scale the number of pods correctly ([#95647](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/95647), [@JoshuaAndrew](https://github.com/JoshuaAndrew)) [SIG Apps and Autoscaling]

* add goroutine to move unschedulable pods to activeq if they are not retried for more than 1 minute ([#72558](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/72558), [@denkensk](https://github.com/denkensk))
* Scale max-inflight limits together with master VM sizes. ([#73268](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/73268), [@wojtek-t](https://github.com/wojtek-t))

`Policy` optionally took in a `tf.compat.v1.mixed_precision.LossScale` in the constructor, which defaulted to a dynamic loss scale for the `"mixed_float16"` policy and no loss scale for other policies. In `Model.compile`, if the model's policy had a loss scale, the optimizer would be wrapped with a `LossScaleOptimizer`. With the non-experimental `Policy`, there is no loss scale associated with the `Policy`, and `Model.compile` wraps the optimizer with a `LossScaleOptimizer` if and only if the policy...

	// can easily eat into the internode bandwidth. This function would be mostly
	// TX saturating, however there are situations where a RX might also saturate.
	// To avoid these problems we must split the work at scale. With 1000 node
	// setup becoming a reality we must try to shard the work properly such as
	// pick 10 nodes that precisely can send those 100 requests the first node