final String key = e.getKey();
            if (StringUtil.isBlank(key)) {
                return false;
            }
            return pattern.matcher(key).matches();
        }).collect(Collectors.toMap(Entry<String, String>::getKey, Entry<String, String>::getValue));
    }

    /**
     * Gets a map of environment variables.
     *

   * @since 14.0
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // regular expressions
  public static @Nullable Double tryParse(String string) {
    if (FLOATING_POINT_PATTERN.matcher(string).matches()) {
      // TODO(lowasser): could be potentially optimized, but only with
      // extensive testing
      try {
        return Double.parseDouble(string);
      } catch (NumberFormatException e) {

	builder.WriteQuoted(lte.Column)
	builder.WriteString(" <= ")
	builder.AddVar(builder, lte.Value)
}

func (lte Lte) NegationBuild(builder Builder) {
	Gt(lte).Build(builder)
}

// Like whether string matches regular expression
type Like Eq

func (like Like) Build(builder Builder) {
	builder.WriteQuoted(like.Column)
	builder.WriteString(" LIKE ")
	builder.AddVar(builder, like.Value)
}

    This PR fixes a security issue where an IAM user based
    on his policy is granted more privileges than restricted
    by the users IAM policy.

    This is due to an issue of prefix based Matcher() function
    which was incorrectly matching prefix based on resource
    prefixes instead of exact match.
```

   * given predicate, if such an element exists.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> avoid using a {@code predicate} that matches {@code null}. If {@code null}
   * is matched in {@code iterable}, a NullPointerException will be thrown.
   *
   * <p><b>{@code Stream} equivalent:</b> {@code stream.filter(predicate).findFirst()}
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */

 * available online).
 * <p>
 * Direct ACEs are evaluated first in order. The SID of the user performing
 * the operation and the desired access bits are compared to the SID
 * and access mask of each ACE. If the SID matches, the allow/deny flags
 * and access mask are considered. If the ACE is a "deny"
 * ACE and <i>any</i> of the desired access bits match bits in the access
 * mask of the ACE, the whole access check fails. If the ACE is an "allow"

     */
    protected HtmlResponse doSearch(final ListForm form) {
        validate(form, messages -> {}, this::asListHtml);

        if (StringUtil.isBlank(form.q)) {
            // query matches on all documents.
            form.q = Constants.MATCHES_ALL_QUERY;
        }
        final WebRenderData renderData = new WebRenderData();
        form.initialize();

Dies kann es Ihren Benutzern viel einfacher machen, **deren APIs zu implementieren**, um Ihre **Webhook**-Requests zu empfangen. Möglicherweise können diese sogar einen Teil des eigenem API-Codes automatisch generieren.

/// info

<%@page pageEncoding="UTF-8" contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8"%>
<%-- query matched some document --%>
<div id="subheader" class="row">
	<div class="col">
		<p>
			<c:if test="${allRecordCountRelation=='EQUAL_TO'}">
				<la:message key="labels.search_result_status"
					arg0="${displayQuery}" arg1="${fe:formatNumber(allRecordCount,'###,###')}"
					arg2="${f:h(currentStartRecordNumber)}"
					arg3="${f:h(currentEndRecordNumber)}" />

        .map { it.subjectDN.name }
        .toSet()

    // It's safe to assume all platforms will have a major Internet certificate issuer.
    assertThat(names).matchesPredicate { strings ->
      strings.any { it.matches(Regex("[A-Z]+=Entrust.*")) }
    }
  }

  private fun startTlsServer(): InetSocketAddress {
    val serverSocketFactory = ServerSocketFactory.getDefault()
    serverSocket = serverSocketFactory.createServerSocket()