// one is still running.
            //
            // Now, maybe we could tweak our implementation to not start the next task until the
            // callable actually completes. (We could detect completion in our wrapper
            // `AsyncCallable task`.) However, our contract also promises:
            //
            // 2. not to cancel any Future the user returned from an AsyncCallable

	}
	return b.String()
}

func (ri replicatedInfos) Action() replicationAction {
	for _, t := range ri.Targets {
		if t.Empty() {
			continue
		}
		// rely on replication action from target that actually performed replication now.
		if t.PrevReplicationStatus != replication.Completed {
			return t.ReplicationAction
		}
	}
	return replicateNone
}

   *
   * <p>This method is just a small convenience, either for {@code newHashSet(}{@link Arrays#asList
   * asList}{@code (...))}, or for creating an empty set then calling {@link Collections#addAll}.
   * This method is not actually very useful and will likely be deprecated in the future.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("NonApiType") // acts as a direct substitute for a constructor call

  }

  private static final CharMatcher WHATEVER =
      new CharMatcher() {
        @Override
        public boolean matches(char c) {
          throw new AssertionFailedError("You weren't supposed to actually invoke me!");
        }
      };

  public void testAnyAndNone_logicalOps() throws Exception {
    // These are testing behavior that's never promised by the API, but since

 *       as {@code findFirst()} or {@code iterator()} is invoked. (Even though {@code Stream}
 *       contains all the right method <i>signatures</i> to implement {@link Iterable}, it does not
 *       actually do so, to avoid implying repeat-iterability.) {@code FluentIterable}, on the other
 *       hand, is multiple-use, and does implement {@link Iterable}.

 *       as {@code findFirst()} or {@code iterator()} is invoked. (Even though {@code Stream}
 *       contains all the right method <i>signatures</i> to implement {@link Iterable}, it does not
 *       actually do so, to avoid implying repeat-iterability.) {@code FluentIterable}, on the other
 *       hand, is multiple-use, and does implement {@link Iterable}.

  //    guard doesn't have anything to do with leaving. You can't
  //    really enforce that the guard you're leaving is the same one
  //    you entered with, and it doesn't actually matter.
  //
  // 2. Since you can enter the monitor without a guard at all, some
  //    places you'll have monitor.enter()/monitor.leave() and other
  //    places you'll have guard.enter()/guard.leave() even though

   * multimap.asMap()} view. Repeated occurrences of an entry in the multimap after the first are
   * ignored.
   *
   * <p>Despite the method name, this method attempts to avoid actually copying the data when it is
   * safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *

    if (!Objects.equals(actual, expected)) {
      // fail(), but with the JUnit-supplied message.
      assertEquals("Using seed " + seed, expected, actual);
    }
  }

  private static void assertEqualsUsingStartedWith(
      Collection<?> startedWith, @Nullable Object expected, @Nullable Object actual) {
    if (!Objects.equals(actual, expected)) {

   * "key-grouped" iteration order described in the class documentation.
   *
   * <p>Despite the method name, this method attempts to avoid actually copying the data when it is
   * safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *