*
   * <p>This method can be used to determine whether it will probably be possible to set cookies on
   * the domain, though even that depends on individual browsers' implementations of cookie
   * controls. See <a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2109.txt">RFC 2109</a> for details.
   *
   * @since 6.0
   */
  public boolean isUnderPublicSuffix() {
    return publicSuffixIndex() > 0;

   *
   * <p>By default this method does nothing.
   */
  protected void startUp() throws Exception {}

  /**
   * Run the service. This method is invoked on the execution thread. Implementations must respond
   * to stop requests. You could poll for lifecycle changes in a work loop:
   *
   * <pre>
   *   public void run() {
   *     while ({@link #isRunning()}) {
   *       // perform a unit of work

      new NullPointerTester().testAllPublicInstanceMethods(striped);
    }
  }

  public void testSizes() {
    // not bothering testing all variations, since we know they share implementations
    assertTrue(Striped.lock(100).size() >= 100);
    assertTrue(Striped.lock(256).size() == 256);
    assertTrue(Striped.lazyWeakLock(100).size() >= 100);
    assertTrue(Striped.lazyWeakLock(256).size() == 256);
  }

      new NullPointerTester().testAllPublicInstanceMethods(striped);
    }
  }

  public void testSizes() {
    // not bothering testing all variations, since we know they share implementations
    assertTrue(Striped.lock(100).size() >= 100);
    assertTrue(Striped.lock(256).size() == 256);
    assertTrue(Striped.lazyWeakLock(100).size() >= 100);
    assertTrue(Striped.lazyWeakLock(256).size() == 256);
  }

/**
 * Abstract base class for RDMA connections.
 *
 * Manages connection state, credit flow control, and provides
 * abstract methods for RDMA operations that must be implemented
 * by specific provider implementations.
 */
public abstract class RdmaConnection implements AutoCloseable {

    /**
     * RDMA connection state enumeration
     */
    public enum RdmaConnectionState {
        /** Connection is not established */

The SSE schemes described in [Secret Keys](#Secret-Keys) and [Content Encryption](#Content-Encryption) are generic over the cryptographic primitives. However, the MinIO server uses the following cryptographic primitive implementations:

- [PRF](#prf): HMAC-SHA-256
- [AEAD](#aead): AES-256-GCM if the CPU supports AES-NI, ChaCha20-Poly1305 otherwise. More specifically AES-256-GCM is only selected for X86-64 CPUs with AES-NI extension.

   * FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()}.
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): or we could make HOLES_FORBIDDEN a feature. Or we could declare that
   * implementations are permitted to throw IAE if a hole is requested, and we could update
   * test*Hole to permit IAE. (But might this ignore genuine bugs?) But see the TODO above
   * testLower, which could make this all unnecessary
   */

   * whether our solution scales to use with multiple exception types and to whether it is affected
   * by other {@code ClassValue} users. Some of the benchmarked implementations don't use one or
   * both of these mechanisms, so they will be unaffected.
   */
  @Param({"0", "1", "12"})
  int otherEntriesInDataStructure;

 * that of its keys. This constraint enables bimaps to support an "inverse view", which is another
 * bimap containing the same entries as this bimap but with reversed keys and values.
 *
 * <h3>Implementations</h3>
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>{@link ImmutableBiMap}
 *   <li>{@link HashBiMap}
 *   <li>{@link EnumBiMap}
 *   <li>{@link EnumHashBiMap}
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a href=

   * {@code expectContents()} invokes this version</strong>.
   *
   * @param expected expected value of {@link #container}
   */
  /*
   * TODO: improve this and other implementations and move out of this framework
   * for wider use
   *
   * TODO: could we incorporate the overriding logic from AbstractListTester, by
   * examining whether the features include KNOWN_ORDER?
   */