use more than 4GB of temp memory. This results in garbage results and/or
    `CUDA_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS` failures.

    A fix in CUDA 9.1.121 is expected in late February 2018. We do not expect a
    fix for CUDA 9.0.x. Until the fix is available, the only workaround is to
    [downgrade](https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-toolkit-archive) to CUDA 8.0.x
    or disable XLA:GPU.

   * corresponding input future returns/throws.
   *
   * <p>"In the order that they complete" means, for practical purposes, about what you would
   * expect, but there are some subtleties. First, we do guarantee that, if the output future at
   * index n is done, the output future at index n-1 is also done. (But as usual with futures, some

		return
	}

	etag := getDecryptedETag(formValues, objInfo, false)

	// We must not use the http.Header().Set method here because some (broken)
	// clients expect the ETag header key to be literally "ETag" - not "Etag" (case-sensitive).
	// Therefore, we have to set the ETag directly as map entry.
	w.Header()[xhttp.ETag] = []string{`"` + etag + `"`}

		if err != testCase.expectedErr {
			t.Errorf("TestXLStorage case %d: Expected: \"%s\", got: \"%s\"", i+1, testCase.expectedErr, err)
		}
		if err == nil {
			for _, expected := range testCase.expectedListDir {
				if !strings.Contains(strings.Join(dirList, ","), expected) {
					t.Errorf("TestXLStorage case %d: Expected the directory listing to be \"%v\", but got \"%v\"", i+1, testCase.expectedListDir, dirList)
				}

   * but it is observed to be true for OpenJDK 1.7. It also can't be guaranteed that the method
   * isn't inadvertently <i>oversizing</i> the returned map.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of entries you expect to add to the returned map
   * @return a new, empty {@code HashMap} with enough capacity to hold {@code expectedSize} entries
   *     without resizing
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code expectedSize} is negative

   * but it is observed to be true for OpenJDK 1.7. It also can't be guaranteed that the method
   * isn't inadvertently <i>oversizing</i> the returned map.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of entries you expect to add to the returned map
   * @return a new, empty {@code HashMap} with enough capacity to hold {@code expectedSize} entries
   *     without resizing
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code expectedSize} is negative

 * <tr>
 * <td ><code>smb://angus/</code></td>
 * <td>
 * This references only a server. The behavior of some methods is different
 * in this context(e.g. you cannot <code>delete</code> a server) however
 * as you might expect the <code>list</code> method will list the available
 * shares on this server.
 * </td>
 * </tr>
 *
 * <tr>
 * <td ><code>smb://angus.foo.net/d/jcifs/pipes.doc</code></td>
 * <td>

	if len(buf) <= 8 {
		return payload, 0, 0, fmt.Errorf("xlMeta: no data")
	}

	if !bytes.Equal(buf[:4], xlHeader[:]) {
		return payload, 0, 0, fmt.Errorf("xlMeta: unknown XLv2 header, expected %v, got %v", xlHeader[:4], buf[:4])
	}

	if bytes.Equal(buf[4:8], []byte("1   ")) {
		// Set as 1,0.
		major, minor = 1, 0
	} else {

Joel Sing <******@****.***> 1718380829 +1000

   * rate, and ability to be implemented with O(1) time complexity. The initial LRU implementation
   * operates per-segment rather than globally for increased implementation simplicity. We expect
   * the cache hit rate to be similar to that of a global LRU algorithm.
   */

  // Constants

  /**
   * The maximum capacity, used if a higher value is implicitly specified by either of the