* runtime at all. I could just make _this_ test a MediumTest, but then it wouldn't run on
   * Android.... The right long-term fix is probably to get MediumTests running under Android by
   * default and then suppress them strategically as needed.
   */
  public static final class ConcretePackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {}

    }
    return tableSize;
  }

  static CharMatcher from(BitSet chars, String description) {
    // Compute the filter.
    long filter = 0;
    int size = chars.cardinality();
    boolean containsZero = chars.get(0);
    // Compute the hash table.
    char[] table = new char[chooseTableSize(size)];
    int mask = table.length - 1;
    for (int c = chars.nextSetBit(0); c != -1; c = chars.nextSetBit(c + 1)) {

    private static URLStreamHandler getDefaultStreamHandler(final String protocol) throws IOException {
        synchronized (PROTOCOL_HANDLERS) {
            URLStreamHandler handler = (URLStreamHandler) PROTOCOL_HANDLERS.get(protocol);
            if (handler != null) {
                return handler;
            }
            if (factory != null) {
                handler = factory.createURLStreamHandler(protocol);
            }

        @Override
        public SmbPipeResource getPipe(String name, int flags) {
            return null; // Not relevant for AbstractCIFSContext tests
        }

        @Override
        public SmbResource get(String key) {
            return null; // Not relevant for AbstractCIFSContext tests
        }
    }

    @Test
    void testWithCredentials() {
        Credentials newCreds = mock(Credentials.class);

///

Luego podemos crear un `AsyncClient` con la app y enviar requests asíncronos a ella, usando `await`.

{* ../../docs_src/async_tests/test_main.py hl[9:12] *}

Esto es equivalente a:

```Python
response = client.get('/')
```

...que usábamos para hacer nuestros requests con el `TestClient`.

/// tip | Consejo

Nota que estamos usando async/await con el nuevo `AsyncClient`: el request es asíncrono.

///

            // TODO Should this be changed for MNG-6754 too?
            snapshot.setTimestamp(getDeploymentTimestamp());

            // we update the build number anyway so that it doesn't get lost. It requires the timestamp to take effect
            try {
                int buildNumber = resolveLatestSnapshotBuildNumber(artifact, localRepository, remoteRepository);

        Class<?> clazz = target.getClass();
        while (clazz != null) {
            try {
                Field f = clazz.getDeclaredField(fieldName);
                f.setAccessible(true);
                return f.get(target);
            } catch (NoSuchFieldException e) {
                clazz = clazz.getSuperclass();
            }
        }
        throw new NoSuchFieldException(fieldName);
    }

					bgSeq.countFailed(res.Type)
				}
			}
		case <-ctx.Done():
			return
		}
	}
}

func newHealRoutine() *healRoutine {
	workers := runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0) / 2

	if envHealWorkers := env.Get("_MINIO_HEAL_WORKERS", ""); envHealWorkers != "" {
		if numHealers, err := strconv.Atoi(envHealWorkers); err != nil {
			bugLogIf(context.Background(), fmt.Errorf("invalid _MINIO_HEAL_WORKERS value: %w", err))
		} else {

		// Check if the access key is part of users credentials.
		u, ok := globalIAMSys.GetUser(req.Context(), claims.AccessKey)
		if !ok {
			return nil, nil, false, errInvalidAccessKeyID
		}
		ucred := u.Credentials
		// get embedded claims
		eclaims, s3Err := checkClaimsFromToken(req, ucred)
		if s3Err != ErrNone {
			return nil, nil, false, errAuthentication
		}

		maps.Copy(claims.MapClaims, eclaims)

                    "Unknown phrase query: " + phraseQuery);
        }
        final FessConfig fessConfig = ComponentUtil.getFessConfig();
        final String field = terms[0].field();
        final String[] texts = stream(terms).get(stream -> stream.map(Term::text).toArray(n -> new String[n]));

        return convertPhraseQuery(fessConfig, context, phraseQuery, boost, field, texts);
    }

    /**