| grep -E -v "^//tensorflow" \
  | sed -e 's|:.*||' \
  | sort -u
}

# Verify that, given a build target and a license-list generator target, all of
# the dependencies of that target which include a license notice file are then
# included when generating that license. Necessary because the license targets
# in TensorFlow are manually enumerated rather than generated automatically.
do_external_licenses_check(){
  BUILD_TARGET="$1"

   * could use null, but that messes with our nullness checking, including under J2KT. We could
   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use

      if (!result.isCancelled()) {
        result.get(10, SECONDS);
      }
      // TODO(cpovirk): Verify that the cancelled futures are exactly ones that we expect.
    }

    assertThat(logHandler.getStoredLogRecords()).isEmpty();
  }

  public void testAvoidsStackOverflow_manySubmitted() throws Exception {
    SettableFuture<@Nullable Void> settableFuture = SettableFuture.create();

        // This test verifies that printThreadDump() method exists and can be called without exceptions
        try {
            ThreadDumpUtil.printThreadDump();
        } catch (Exception e) {
            fail("printThreadDump() should not throw exceptions: " + e.getMessage());
        }
    }

    public void test_printThreadDumpAsWarn() {

 * Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *
 * <p>This class has limited support for cancellation and other "early completions":
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>While calls to {@code submit} and {@code submitAsync} return a {@code Future} that can be
 *       cancelled, cancellation never propagates to a task that has started to run -- neither to

 *
 * <p>However, when {@link CollectionSize.Require} is used to annotate a test it behaves normally
 * (i.e. it requires the collection instance under test to be a certain size for the test to run).
 * Note that this means a test should not require more than one CollectionSize, since a particular
 * collection instance can only be one size at once.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */

 *
 * <p>However, when {@link CollectionSize.Require} is used to annotate a test it behaves normally
 * (i.e. it requires the collection instance under test to be a certain size for the test to run).
 * Note that this means a test should not require more than one CollectionSize, since a particular
 * collection instance can only be one size at once.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */

         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our
         * new TypeVariable _will_ be equal to is an equivalent TypeVariable that was also created

	instructions["JGE"] = x86.AJGE  /* greater than or equal (signed) (SF = OF) */
	instructions["JGT"] = x86.AJGT  /* greater than (signed) (ZF = 0 && SF = OF) */
	instructions["JHI"] = x86.AJHI  /* higher (unsigned) (CF = 0 && ZF = 0) */
	instructions["JHS"] = x86.AJCC  /* alternate */
	instructions["JL"] = x86.AJLT   /* alternate */
	instructions["JLE"] = x86.AJLE  /* less than or equal (signed) (ZF = 1 || SF != OF) */

There have been many tools created before that have helped inspire its creation.

I have been avoiding the creation of a new framework for several years. First I tried to solve all the features covered by **FastAPI** using many different frameworks, plug-ins, and tools.