* reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available
   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */

   * reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available
   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */

Konkret geht es darum, Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI miteinander zu vergleichen (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, welches durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser ist die Performanz. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, welche das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

* **Uvicorn**: ein ASGI-Server

of the GNU Lesser General Public License from time to time. Such new
versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may
differ in detail to address new problems or concerns.

  Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the
Library as you received it specifies that a certain numbered version
of the GNU Lesser General Public License "or any later version"

/// tip | Dica

Integração com outros provedores de autenticação/autorização como Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub, etc. é bem possível e relativamente fácil.

O problema mais complexo é criar um provedor de autenticação/autorização como eles, mas o FastAPI dá a você ferramentas para fazer isso facilmente, enquanto faz o trabalho pesado para você.

///

## **FastAPI** utilitários

     * The specific problem we had was unsafe reads of lastEntryReturnedBySomeIterator. (To fix the
     * problem, we've since marked that field as volatile.)
     *
     * When MapIteratorCache is used from Immutable* classes, the TSAN failure doesn't indicate a
     * real problem: The Entry objects are ImmutableMap entries, whose fields are all final and thus

Sie sind jedoch nicht auf die Verwendung von bestimmten Datenmodellen, Klassen, oder Typen beschränkt.

Möchten Sie eine `id` und eine `email` und keinen `username` in Ihrem Modell haben? Kein Problem. Sie können dieselben Tools verwenden.

Möchten Sie nur ein `str` haben? Oder nur ein `dict`? Oder direkt eine Instanz eines Modells einer Datenbank-Klasse? Es funktioniert alles auf die gleiche Weise.

  - type: textarea
    id: code-to-reproduce
    attributes:
      label: Standalone code to reproduce the issue
      description: Provide a reproducible test case that is the bare minimum necessary to generate the problem. Please share a link to Colab, Jupyter, or any notebook.
      placeholder: Tell us what you see!
      value:
      render: shell
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: logs

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Immer wenn jetzt ein Browser einen Benutzer mit Passwort erzeugt, gibt die API dasselbe Passwort in der Response zurück.

Hier ist das möglicherweise kein Problem, da es derselbe Benutzer ist, der das Passwort sendet.

Aber wenn wir dasselbe Modell für eine andere *Pfadoperation* verwenden, könnten wir das Passwort dieses Benutzers zu jedem Client schicken.

/// danger | Gefahr